» Articles » PMID: 32422867

Differential Changes in Early Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand, Following a Novel Motor Tracing Task

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 May 20
PMID 32422867
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During training in a novel dynamic environment, the non-dominant upper limb favors feedback control, whereas the dominant limb favors feedforward mechanisms. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) offer a means to explore differences in cortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration (SMI). This study sought to compare differences in SMI between the right (Dom) and left (Non-Dom) hand in healthy right-handed participants. SEPs were recorded in response to median nerve stimulation, at baseline and post, a motor skill acquisition-tracing task. One group ( = 12) trained with their Dom hand and the other group ( = 12), with their Non-Dom hand. The Non-Dom hand was significantly more accurate at baseline ( < 0.0001) and both groups improved with time ( < 0.0001), for task accuracy, with no significant interaction effect between groups for both post-acquisition and retention. There were significant group interactions for the N24 ( < 0.001) and the N30 ( < 0.0001) SEP peaks. Post motor acquisition, the Dom hand had a 28.9% decrease in the N24 and a 23.8% increase in the N30, with opposite directional changes for the Non-Dom hand; 22.04% increase in N24 and 24% decrease in the N30. These SEP changes reveal differences in early SMI between Dom and Non-Dom hands in response to motor acquisition, providing objective, temporally sensitive measures of differences in neural mechanisms between the limbs.

Citing Articles

Sensorimotor integration and motor learning during a novel force-matching task in young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

McCracken H, Murphy B, Ambalavanar U, Glazebrook C, Yielder P Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:1078925.

PMID: 36684834 PMC: 9849696. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1078925.


When the non-dominant arm dominates: the effects of visual information and task experience on speed-accuracy advantages.

Dexheimer B, Sainburg R Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(2):655-665.

PMID: 33388816 PMC: 8063124. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06011-6.

References
1.
Panouilleres M, Miall R, Jenkinson N . The role of the posterior cerebellum in saccadic adaptation: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(14):5471-9. PMC: 4388915. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4064-14.2015. View

2.
Doyon J, Benali H . Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15(2):161-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004. View

3.
Mutha P, Haaland K, Sainburg R . The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation. J Mot Behav. 2012; 44(6):455-69. PMC: 3549328. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.747482. View

4.
Andrew D, Yielder P, Murphy B . Do pursuit movement tasks lead to differential changes in early somatosensory evoked potentials related to motor learning compared with typing tasks?. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 113(4):1156-64. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00713.2014. View

5.
Restuccia D, Della Marca G, Valeriani M, Leggio M, Molinari M . Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study. Brain. 2006; 130(Pt 1):276-87. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl236. View