» Articles » PMID: 15814983

Utility of Pooled Urine Specimens for Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis and Neisseria Gonorrhoeae in Men Attending Public Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2005 Apr 9
PMID 15814983
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pooling urogenital specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by nucleic acid amplification tests is an attractive alternative to individual testing. As pooling can reduce the costs of testing as well as labor, it has been advocated for use in resource-poor settings. However, it has neither been widely adopted nor evaluated for use in developing countries. We evaluated the practical use of pooling first-catch urine (FCU) specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae from 690 men in Mumbai, India, by PCR. FCU, urethral smears, and swabs were collected from men seen at two sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. All laboratory testing was done at the Lokmanya Tilak General Hospital. Gram stain smears and culture isolation for N. gonorrhoeae were performed. Each FCU was tested individually and in pools using the Roche Amplicor PCR for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae with an internal control for inhibition. Specimen pools consisted of aliquots from five consecutively processed FCUs combined into an amplification tube. An optical density reading of > or =0.20 indicated a pool for which subsequent testing of individual samples was required. Prevalence by PCR on single specimens was 2.2% (15/690) for C. trachomatis and 5.4% (37/690) for N. gonorrhoeae. Compared to individual FCU results, pooling for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae had an overall sensitivity of 96.1% (50/52). Specificity was 96.5% (83/86) in that three pools required single testing that failed to identify a positive specimen. Pooling missed two positive specimens, decreased the inhibition rate, and saved 50.3% of reagent costs. In this resource-limited setting, the use of pooling to detect C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by PCR proved to be a simple, accurate, and cost-effective procedure compared to individual testing.

Citing Articles

Estimating the prevalence of two or more diseases using outcomes from multiplex group testing.

Warasi M, Tebbs J, McMahan C, Bilder C Biom J. 2023; 65(7):e2200270.

PMID: 37192524 PMC: 11099910. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202200270.


Boosting SARS-CoV-2 detection combining pooling and multiplex strategies.

Correa I, de Souza Rodrigues T, Queiroz A, de Franca Nascimento L, Wolff T, Akamine R Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8684.

PMID: 35606418 PMC: 9126939. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12747-8.


Efficient and effective single-step screening of individual samples for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using multi-dimensional pooling and Bayesian inference.

Sobczyk J, Pyne M, Barker A, Mayer J, Hanson K, Samore M J R Soc Interface. 2021; 18(179):20210155.

PMID: 34129787 PMC: 8205536. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0155.


Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cuevas L, Santos V, Lima S, Kontogianni K, Bimba J, Iem V Emerg Infect Dis. 2021; 27(3):719-727.

PMID: 33622482 PMC: 7920689. DOI: 10.3201/eid2703.204090.


Considerations for Group Testing: A Practical Approach for the Clinical Laboratory.

Tan J, Omar A, Lee W, Wong M Clin Biochem Rev. 2020; 41(3):79-92.

PMID: 33343043 PMC: 7731934. DOI: 10.33176/AACB-20-00007.


References
1.
Gopalkrishna V, Aggarwal N, Malhotra V, Koranne R, Mohan V, Mittal A . Chlamydia trachomatis and human papillomavirus infection in Indian women with sexually transmitted diseases and cervical precancerous and cancerous lesions. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001; 6(2):88-93. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00024.x. View

2.
Martin D, Cammarata C, Van Der Pol B, Jones R, Quinn T, Gaydos C . Multicenter evaluation of AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(10):3544-9. PMC: 87434. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.10.3544-3549.2000. View

3.
Mania-Pramanik J, Meherji P, Gokral J, Donde U . Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an urban setting. Sex Transm Infect. 2001; 77(2):141. PMC: 1744272. DOI: 10.1136/sti.77.2.141. View

4.
Morre S, van Dijk R, Meijer C, van den Brule A, Kjaer S, Munk C . Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39(6):2375-6. PMC: 88155. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2375-2376.2001. View

5.
DIAMANT J, Benis R, Schachter J, Moncada J, Pang F, Jha H . Pooling of Chlamydia laboratory tests to determine the prevalence of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001; 8(2-3):109-17. DOI: 10.1076/opep.8.2.109.4156. View