» Articles » PMID: 15754052

Secondary Structural Effects on Protein NMR Chemical Shifts

Overview
Journal J Biomol NMR
Publisher Springer
Date 2005 Mar 9
PMID 15754052
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For an amino acid in protein, its chemical shift, delta(phi, psi)(s), is expressed as a function of its backbone torsion angles (phi and psi) and secondary state (s): delta(phi, psi)(s=deltaphi, psi)_coil+Deltadelta(phi, psi)_s), where delta(phi, psi)(coil) represents its chemical shift at coil state (s=coil); Delta delta(phi, psi)(s) (s=sheet or helix) is herein defined as secondary structural effect correction factor, which are quantitatively determined from Residue-specific Secondary Structure Shielding Surface (RSS) for (13)CO, (13)Calpha, (13)Cbeta,(1)Halpha, (15)N, and (1)HN nuclei. The secondary structural effect correction factors defined in this study differ from those in earlier investigations by separating out the backbone conformational effects. As a consequence, their magnitudes are significantly smaller than those earlier reported. The present Delta delta(phi, psi)(sheet) and Delta delta(phi, psi)(helix) were found varying little with backbone conformation and the 20 amino acids, specifically for (13)CO, (13)Calpha, and (1)Halpha nuclei. This study also carries out some useful investigations on other chemical shift prediction approaches - the traditional shielding surfaces, SHIFTS, SHIFTX, PROSHIFT, and identifies some unexpected shortcomings with these methods. It provides some useful insights into understanding protein chemical shifts and suggests a new route to improving chemical shifts prediction. The RSS surfaces were incorporated into the program PRSI.

Citing Articles

Identify Beta-Hairpin Motifs with Quadratic Discriminant Algorithm Based on the Chemical Shifts.

YongE F, GaoShan K PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0139280.

PMID: 26422468 PMC: 4589334. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139280.


Prediction of four kinds of simple supersecondary structures in protein by using chemical shifts.

YongE F ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2014:978503.

PMID: 25050407 PMC: 4090465. DOI: 10.1155/2014/978503.


Mapping of protein structural ensembles by chemical shifts.

Baskaran K, Brunner K, Munte C, Kalbitzer H J Biomol NMR. 2010; 48(2):71-83.

PMID: 20680402 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-010-9438-4.


Cooperative formation of native-like tertiary contacts in the ensemble of unfolded states of a four-helix protein.

Bruun S, Iesmantavicius V, Danielsson J, Poulsen F Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(30):13306-11.

PMID: 20624986 PMC: 2922131. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003004107.


4D prediction of protein (1)H chemical shifts.

Lehtivarjo J, Hassinen T, Korhonen S, Perakyla M, Laatikainen R J Biomol NMR. 2009; 45(4):413-26.

PMID: 19876601 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-009-9384-1.


References
1.
Wang Y, Jardetzky O . Investigation of the neighboring residue effects on protein chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc. 2002; 124(47):14075-84. DOI: 10.1021/ja026811f. View

2.
Beger R, Bolton P . Protein phi and psi dihedral restraints determined from multidimensional hypersurface correlations of backbone chemical shifts and their use in the determination of protein tertiary structures. J Biomol NMR. 1997; 10(2):129-42. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018302105638. View

3.
Cornilescu G, Delaglio F, Bax A . Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J Biomol NMR. 1999; 13(3):289-302. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008392405740. View

4.
Williamson M, Kikuchi J, Asakura T . Application of 1H NMR chemical shifts to measure the quality of protein structures. J Mol Biol. 1995; 247(4):541-6. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0160. View

5.
Aurora R, Rose G . Helix capping. Protein Sci. 1998; 7(1):21-38. PMC: 2143812. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560070103. View