Identify Beta-Hairpin Motifs with Quadratic Discriminant Algorithm Based on the Chemical Shifts

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2015 Oct 1

PMID 26422468

Citations 6

Authors

Feng YongE

Kou GaoShan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Successful prediction of the beta-hairpin motif will be helpful for understanding the of the fold recognition. Some algorithms have been proposed for the prediction of beta-hairpin motifs. However, the parameters used by these methods were primarily based on the amino acid sequences. Here, we proposed a novel model for predicting beta-hairpin structure based on the chemical shift. Firstly, we analyzed the statistical distribution of chemical shifts of six nuclei in not beta-hairpin and beta-hairpin motifs. Secondly, we used these chemical shifts as features combined with three algorithms to predict beta-hairpin structure. Finally, we achieved the best prediction, namely sensitivity of 92%, the specificity of 94% with 0.85 of Mathew's correlation coefficient using quadratic discriminant analysis algorithm, which is clearly superior to the same method for the prediction of beta-hairpin structure from 20 amino acid compositions in the three-fold cross-validation. Our finding showed that the chemical shift is an effective parameter for beta-hairpin prediction, suggesting the quadratic discriminant analysis is a powerful algorithm for the prediction of beta-hairpin.

Citing Articles

MultiToxPred 1.0: a novel comprehensive tool for predicting 27 classes of protein toxins using an ensemble machine learning approach.

Beltran J, Herrera-Belen L, Parraguez-Contreras F, Farias J, Machuca-Sepulveda J, Short S BMC Bioinformatics. 2024; 25(1):148.

PMID: 38609877 PMC: 11010298. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-024-05748-z.

Linear discriminant analysis reveals hidden patterns in NMR chemical shifts of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Romero J, Putko P, Urbanczyk M, Kazimierczuk K, Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk A PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(10):e1010258.

PMID: 36201530 PMC: 9578625. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010258.

Current Approaches in Supersecondary Structures Investigation.

Rudnev V, Kulikova L, Nikolsky K, Malsagova K, Kopylov A, Kaysheva A Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(21).

PMID: 34769310 PMC: 8584461. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111879.

Improving Protein Gamma-Turn Prediction Using Inception Capsule Networks.

Fang C, Shang Y, Xu D Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):15741.

PMID: 30356073 PMC: 6200818. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34114-2.

iNuc-ext-PseTNC: an efficient ensemble model for identification of nucleosome positioning by extending the concept of Chou's PseAAC to pseudo-tri-nucleotide composition.

Tahir M, Hayat M, Khan S Mol Genet Genomics. 2018; 294(1):199-210.

PMID: 30291426 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-018-1498-2.

References

Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Dobson C, Vendruscolo M . Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(23):9615-20. PMC: 1887584. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610313104. View

Xiao X, Wang P, Lin W, Jia J, Chou K . iAMP-2L: a two-level multi-label classifier for identifying antimicrobial peptides and their functional types. Anal Biochem. 2013; 436(2):168-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.01.019. View

Kou G, Feng Y . Identify five kinds of simple super-secondary structures with quadratic discriminant algorithm based on the chemical shifts. J Theor Biol. 2015; 380:392-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.006. View

Wishart D, Case D . Use of chemical shifts in macromolecular structure determination. Methods Enzymol. 2001; 338:3-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)38214-4. View

Case D . The use of chemical shifts and their anisotropies in biomolecular structure determination. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998; 8(5):624-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80155-3. View

Chen X, Ishwaran H . Random forests for genomic data analysis. Genomics. 2012; 99(6):323-9. PMC: 3387489. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.003. View

Mechelke M, Habeck M . A probabilistic model for secondary structure prediction from protein chemical shifts. Proteins. 2013; 81(6):984-93. DOI: 10.1002/prot.24249. View

Chou K . Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition. J Theor Biol. 2010; 273(1):236-47. PMC: 7125570. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024. View

Hayat M, Khan A . Discriminating outer membrane proteins with Fuzzy K-nearest Neighbor algorithms based on the general form of Chou's PseAAC. Protein Pept Lett. 2011; 19(4):411-21. DOI: 10.2174/092986612799789387. View

10.

Jiang P, Wu H, Wang W, Ma W, Sun X, Lu Z . MiPred: classification of real and pseudo microRNA precursors using random forest prediction model with combined features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(Web Server issue):W339-44. PMC: 1933124. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm368. View

11.

Esmaeili M, Mohabatkar H, Mohsenzadeh S . Using the concept of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition for risk type prediction of human papillomaviruses. J Theor Biol. 2009; 263(2):203-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.016. View

12.

Fernandez-Fuentes N, Hermoso A, Espadaler J, Querol E, Aviles F, Oliva B . Classification of common functional loops of kinase super-families. Proteins. 2004; 56(3):539-55. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20136. View

13.

Chou K, Shen H . Cell-PLoc: a package of Web servers for predicting subcellular localization of proteins in various organisms. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3(2):153-62. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.494. View

14.

Hu X, Li Q . Prediction of the beta-hairpins in proteins using support vector machine. Protein J. 2007; 27(2):115-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10930-007-9114-z. View

15.

Brender J, Taylor D, Ramamoorthy A . Orientation of amide-nitrogen-15 chemical shift tensors in peptides: a quantum chemical study. J Am Chem Soc. 2001; 123(5):914-22. DOI: 10.1021/ja001980q. View

16.

Zhang H, Neal S, Wishart D . RefDB: a database of uniformly referenced protein chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR. 2003; 25(3):173-95. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022836027055. View

17.

Poon A, Birn J, Ramamoorthy A . How Does an Amide-N Chemical Shift Tensor Vary in Peptides?. J Phys Chem B. 2008; 108(42):16577-16585. PMC: 2361394. DOI: 10.1021/jp0471913. View

18.

Kuhn M, Meiler J, Baker D . Strand-loop-strand motifs: prediction of hairpins and diverging turns in proteins. Proteins. 2003; 54(2):282-8. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10589. View

19.

Burke D, Deane C . Improved protein loop prediction from sequence alone. Protein Eng. 2001; 14(7):473-8. DOI: 10.1093/protein/14.7.473. View

20.

Sun Z, Rao X, Peng L, Xu D . Prediction of protein supersecondary structures based on the artificial neural network method. Protein Eng. 1997; 10(7):763-9. DOI: 10.1093/protein/10.7.763. View