» Articles » PMID: 15752373

Dosing Strategy for Enoxaparin in Patients with Renal Impairment Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2005 Mar 9
PMID 15752373
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Phase III clinical studies have confirmed that enoxaparin is superior to standard heparin in reducing the rate of recurrent ischaemic events in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Patients with moderate to severe renal impairment were, however, excluded from these studies. Due to the hydrophilic disposition of enoxaparin, accumulation is likely in patients with renal dysfunction, thereby increasing the risk of haemorrhagic complications if standard weight adjusted treatment doses are used. Arbitrary dose reduction has been reported to increase the risk of ischaemic events, presumably due to inadequate enoxaparin concentrations.

Aim: The aims of this study were to investigate the influence of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered enoxaparin, and to develop a practical dosing algorithm in renal impairment that can easily be used at the bedside.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients, median age 78 years (range 44-87), mean GFR 32 ml min(-1) (range 16-117) and mean weight 69 kg (range 32-95), presenting with acute coronary syndrome were recruited into the study. Approximately 10 anti-Xa concentrations were taken per patient over their period of therapy. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using non linear mixed effects modelling techniques, utilizing the software NONMEM. Stochastic simulations were performed to identify the most suitable dosing regimen.

Results: Three hundred and thirteen anti-Xa concentrations were collected. A two compartment, first order input model was identified as the best baseline model. Covariates found to improve model fitting were GFR as a linear function on clearance (CL) and weight as a linear function on the central volume compartment (Vc). The fraction of drug excreted unchanged (Fu) was estimated at 71%. CL and Vc from the final covariate model were estimated as; CL (l h(-1)) = 0.681 per 4.8 l hr(-1) (GFR) + 0.229 Vc (l) = 5.22 per 80 kg (total body weight)

Conclusions: Clearance of enoxaparin was predictably related to GFR estimated using the Cockroft and Gault equation, with ideal body weight used as the size descriptor. According to our model no dosage adjustment from the standard 1.0 mg kg(-1) 12 hourly is required for the first 48 h of treatment. Maintenance doses thereafter can be calculated using standard proportional adjustments based on Fu equal to 0.71.

Citing Articles

A Clinical Practice-Based Comparison of Conventional and Individualized Dosing Strategies for Therapeutic Enoxaparin.

Damiani A, De Menezes Caceres V, Roberts G, Coddo J, Scarfo N, Willliams D Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025; 13(1):e70039.

PMID: 39853909 PMC: 11760983. DOI: 10.1002/prp2.70039.


Low and Highly Variable Exposure to Prophylactic LMWH Nadroparin in Critically Ill Patients: Back to the Drawing Board for Prophylactic Dosing?.

Diepstraten J, van Rongen A, Zijlstra M, Kruip M, van der Heiden P, Ter Heine R Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022; 62(2):297-305.

PMID: 36581732 PMC: 9800240. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01202-6.


Pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in COVID-19 critically ill patients.

Zufferey P, Dupont A, Lanoiselee J, Bauters A, Poissy J, Goutay J Thromb Res. 2021; 205:120-127.

PMID: 34311154 PMC: 8294601. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.07.010.


Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy is an Independent Predictor for Preoperative Thromboembolic Events in Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

Browne C, Davis N, Nolan W, MacCraith E, Lennon G, Mulvin D Curr Urol. 2017; 10(3):132-135.

PMID: 28878595 PMC: 5582489. DOI: 10.1159/000447166.


Thromboelastography for the monitoring of the antithrombotic effect of low-molecular-weight heparin after major orthopedic surgery.

Tekkesin N, Tekkesin M, Kaso G Anatol J Cardiol. 2015; 15(11):932-7.

PMID: 26574762 PMC: 5336946. DOI: 10.5152/akd.2014.5723.


References
1.
Cadroy Y, Pourrat J, Baladre M, Saivin S, Houin G, Montastruc J . Delayed elimination of enoxaparin in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Thromb Res. 1991; 63(3):385-90. DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(91)90141-i. View

2.
Dawes J, Bara L, Billaud E, Samama M . Relationship between biological activity and concentration of a low-molecular-weight heparin (PK 10169) and unfractionated heparin after intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Haemostasis. 1986; 16(2):116-22. DOI: 10.1159/000215281. View

3.
Antman E, McCabe C, Gurfinkel E, Turpie A, Bernink P, Salein D . Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial. Circulation. 1999; 100(15):1593-601. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.15.1593. View

4.
Du Bois D, Du Bois E . A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition. 1989; 5(5):303-11; discussion 312-3. View

5.
Anastasio P, Spitali L, Frangiosa A, Molino D, Stellato D, Cirillo E . Glomerular filtration rate in severely overweight normotensive humans. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000; 35(6):1144-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(00)70052-7. View