» Articles » PMID: 1569958

A Group of Scs Elements Function As Domain Boundaries in an Enhancer-blocking Assay

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1992 May 1
PMID 1569958
Citations 176
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromosomes of higher eukaryotes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete and topologically independent higher-order domains. In addition to providing a mechanism for chromatin compaction, these higher-order domains are thought to define independent units of gene activity. Implicit in most models for the folding of the chromatin fiber are special nucleoprotein structures, the domain boundaries, which serve to delimit each higher-order chromosomal domain. We have used an "enhancer-blocking assay" to test putative domain boundaries for boundary function in vivo. This assay is based on the notion that in delimiting independent units of gene activity, domain boundaries should be able to restrict the scope of activity of enhancer elements to genes which reside within the same domain. In this case, interposing a boundary between an enhancer and a promoter should block the action of the enhancer. In the experiments reported here, we have used the yolk protein-1 enhancer element and an hsp70 promoter:lacZ fusion gene to test putative boundary DNA segments for enhancer-blocking activity. We have found that several scs-like elements are capable of blocking the action of the yp-1 enhancer when placed between it and the hsp70 promoter. In contrast, a MAR/SAR DNA segment and another spacer DNA segment had no apparent effect on enhancer activity.

Citing Articles

Stem-loop and circle-loop TADs generated by directional pairing of boundary elements have distinct physical and regulatory properties.

Ke W, Fujioka M, Schedl P, Jaynes J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39110491 PMC: 11305674. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94114.


No apparent role for the Wari insulator in transcriptional regulation of the endogenous gene of .

Born G, Bieli D, Metzler M, Gohl D, Affolter M, Muller M MicroPubl Biol. 2023; 2023.

PMID: 37090157 PMC: 10116347. DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000702.


The Drosophila BEAF insulator protein interacts with the polybromo subunit of the PBAP chromatin remodeling complex.

McKowen J, Avva S, Maharjan M, Duarte F, Tome J, Judd J G3 (Bethesda). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36029240 PMC: 9635645. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac223.


Single-nucleus RNA-sequencing in pre-cellularization Drosophila melanogaster embryos.

Albright A, Stadler M, Eisen M PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0270471.

PMID: 35749552 PMC: 9232161. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270471.


Altering enhancer-promoter linear distance impacts promoter competition in cis and in trans.

Bateman J, Johnson J Genetics. 2022; 222(1).

PMID: 35748724 PMC: 9434180. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac098.


References
1.
De Villiers J, Olson L, Banerji J, Schaffner W . Analysis of the transcriptional enhancer effect. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983; 47 Pt 2:911-9. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.105. View

2.
DeLotto R, Schedl P . A Drosophila melanogaster transfer RNA gene cluster at the cytogenetic locus 90BC. J Mol Biol. 1984; 179(4):587-605. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90157-8. View

3.
KELLUM R, Schedl P . A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell. 1991; 64(5):941-50. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90318-s. View

4.
St Johnston R, Hoffmann F, Blackman R, Segal D, Grimaila R, PADGETT R . Molecular organization of the decapentaplegic gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1990; 4(7):1114-27. DOI: 10.1101/gad.4.7.1114. View

5.
Wilson C, Bellen H, Gehring W . Position effects on eukaryotic gene expression. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990; 6:679-714. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003335. View