» Articles » PMID: 15692565

Processing of DNA for Nonhomologous End-joining by Cell-free Extract

Overview
Journal EMBO J
Date 2005 Feb 5
PMID 15692565
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In mammalian cells, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repairs DNA double-strand breaks created by ionizing radiation and V(D)J recombination. We have developed a cell-free system capable of processing and joining noncompatible DNA ends. The system had key features of NHEJ in vivo, including dependence on Ku, DNA-PKcs, and XRCC4/Ligase4. The NHEJ reaction had striking properties. Processing of noncompatible ends involved polymerase and nuclease activities that often stabilized the alignment of opposing ends by base pairing. To achieve this, polymerase activity efficiently synthesized DNA across discontinuities in the template strand, and nuclease activity removed a limited number of nucleotides back to regions of microhomology. Processing was suppressed for DNA ends that could be ligated directly, biasing the reaction to preserve DNA sequence and maintain genomic integrity. DNA sequence internal to the ends influenced the spectrum of processing events for noncompatible ends. Furthermore, internal DNA sequence strongly influenced joining efficiency, even in the absence of processing. These results support a model in which DNA-PKcs plays a central role in regulating the processing of ends for NHEJ.

Citing Articles

Strategies for improving the genome-editing efficiency of class 2 CRISPR/Cas system.

Wang L, Han H Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38588.

PMID: 39397905 PMC: 11471210. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38588.


Pathogenic variants in human DNA damage repair genes mostly arose after the latest human out-of-Africa migration.

He J, Kou S, Li J, Ding X, Wang S Front Genet. 2024; 15:1408952.

PMID: 38948361 PMC: 11211533. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1408952.


Characterizing the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks: A Review of Surrogate Plasmid-Based Reporter Methods.

Dutta A, Mitra J, Hegde P, Mitra S, Hegde M Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2701:173-182.

PMID: 37574482 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3373-1_11.


Holding it together: DNA end synapsis during non-homologous end joining.

Loparo J DNA Repair (Amst). 2023; 130:103553.

PMID: 37572577 PMC: 10530278. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103553.


The flexible and iterative steps within the NHEJ pathway.

Watanabe G, Lieber M Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2023; 180-181:105-119.

PMID: 37150451 PMC: 10205690. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.05.001.


References
1.
Paull T, Gellert M . A mechanistic basis for Mre11-directed DNA joining at microhomologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(12):6409-14. PMC: 18616. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.110144297. View

2.
Cooper M, Machwe A, Orren D, Brosh R, Ramsden D, Bohr V . Ku complex interacts with and stimulates the Werner protein. Genes Dev. 2000; 14(8):907-12. PMC: 316545. View

3.
Lewis L, Resnick M . Tying up loose ends: nonhomologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 2000; 451(1-2):71-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00041-5. View

4.
Hanakahi L, Chappell C, Pappin D, West S . Binding of inositol phosphate to DNA-PK and stimulation of double-strand break repair. Cell. 2000; 102(6):721-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00061-1. View

5.
Chen H, Bhandoola A, Difilippantonio M, Zhu J, Brown M, Tai X . Response to RAG-mediated VDJ cleavage by NBS1 and gamma-H2AX. Science. 2000; 290(5498):1962-5. PMC: 4721589. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5498.1962. View