» Articles » PMID: 15616298

Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2004 Dec 24
PMID 15616298
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three pharmacodynamic models of increasing complexity, designed for two subpopulations of bacteria with different susceptibilities, were developed to describe and predict the evolution of resistance to ciprofloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus by using pharmacokinetic, viable count, subpopulation, and resistance mechanism data obtained from in vitro system experiments. A two-population model with unique growth and killing rate constants for the ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant subpopulations best described the initial killing and subsequent regrowth patterns observed. The model correctly described the enrichment of subpopulations with low-level resistance in the parent cultures but did not identify a relationship between the time ciprofloxacin concentrations were in the mutant selection window (the interval between the MIC and the mutant prevention concentration) and the enrichment of these subpopulations. The model confirmed the importance of resistant variants to the emergence of resistance by successfully predicting that resistant subpopulations would not emerge when a low-density culture, with a low probability of mutants, was exposed to a clinical dosing regimen or when a high-density culture, with a higher probability of mutants, was exposed to a transient high initial concentration designed to rapidly eradicate low-level resistant grlA mutants. The model, however, did not predict or explain the origin of variants with higher levels of resistance that appeared and became the predominant subpopulation during some experiments or the persistence of susceptible bacteria in other experiments where resistance did not emerge. Continued evaluation of the present two-population pharmacodynamic model and development of alternative models is warranted.

Citing Articles

Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin.

Azzariti S, Mead A, Toutain P, Bond R, Pelligand L Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37887249 PMC: 10603860. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101548.


Application of Semi-Mechanistic Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model in Antimicrobial Resistance.

Mi K, Zhou K, Sun L, Hou Y, Ma W, Xu X Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(2).

PMID: 35213979 PMC: 8880204. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020246.


Effects of Growth Medium and Inoculum Size on Pharmacodynamics Activity of Marbofloxacin against Isolated from Caprine Clinical Mastitis.

Lorenzutti A, Andres-Larrea M, Fernandez-Varon E, Del Pilar Zarazaga M, Molina-Lopez A, Serrano-Rodriguez J Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(11).

PMID: 34827228 PMC: 8614650. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10111290.


Sequential Time-Kill, a Simple Experimental Trick To Discriminate between Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Models with Distinct Heterogeneous Subpopulations versus Homogenous Population with Adaptive Resistance.

Chauzy A, Ih H, Jacobs M, Marchand S, Gregoire N, Couet W Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020; 64(8).

PMID: 32513802 PMC: 7526804. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00788-20.


A dose response model for quantifying the infection risk of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Chandrasekaran S, Jiang S Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17093.

PMID: 31745096 PMC: 6863845. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52947-3.


References
1.
Watson D, Prideaux J . Comparisons of Staphylococcus aureus grown in vitro or in vivo. Microbiol Immunol. 1979; 23(6):543-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1979.tb00493.x. View

2.
Baquero F, Negri M, Morosini M, Blazquez J . The antibiotic selective process: concentration-specific amplification of low-level resistant populations. Ciba Found Symp. 1997; 207:93-105; discussion 105-11. DOI: 10.1002/9780470515358.ch7. View

3.
Keren I, Kaldalu N, Spoering A, Wang Y, Lewis K . Persister cells and tolerance to antimicrobials. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004; 230(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00856-5. View

4.
Holford N, Sheiner L . Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1981; 6(6):429-53. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198106060-00002. View

5.
Yano Y, Oguma T, Nagata H, Sasaki S . Application of logistic growth model to pharmacodynamic analysis of in vitro bactericidal kinetics. J Pharm Sci. 1998; 87(10):1177-83. DOI: 10.1021/js9801337. View