» Articles » PMID: 15611195

Polyandry, Life-history Trade-offs and the Evolution of Imprinting at Mendelian Loci

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Dec 22
PMID 15611195
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic imprinting causes parental origin-dependent differential expression of a small number of genes in mammalian and angiosperm plant embryos, resulting in non-Mendelian inheritance of phenotypic traits. The "conflict" theory of the evolution of imprinting proposes that reduced genetic relatedness of paternally, relative to maternally, derived alleles in offspring of polygamous females supports parental sex-specific selection at gene loci that influence maternal investment. While the theory's physiological predictions are well supported by observation, the requirement of polyandry in the evolution of imprinting from an ancestral Mendelian state has not been comprehensively analyzed. Here, we use diallelic models to examine the influence of various degrees of polyandry on the evolution of both Mendelian and imprinted autosomal gene loci that influence trade-offs between maternal fecundity and offspring viability. We show that, given a plausible assumption on the physiological relationship between maternal fecundity and offspring viability, low levels of polyandry are sufficient to reinforce exclusively the fixation of "greedy" paternally imprinted alleles that increase offspring viability at the expense of maternal fecundity and "thrifty" maternally imprinted alleles of opposite effect. We also show that, for all levels of polyandry, Mendelian alleles at genetic loci that influence the trade-off between maternal fecundity and offspring viability reach an evolutionary stable state, whereas pairs of reciprocally imprinted alleles do not.

Citing Articles

Paternally Expressed Imprinted Genes under Positive Darwinian Selection in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Tuteja R, McKeown P, Ryan P, Morgan C, Donoghue M, Downing T Mol Biol Evol. 2019; 36(6):1239-1253.

PMID: 30913563 PMC: 6526901. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz063.


The Effects of ISM1 Medium on Embryo Quality and Outcomes of IVF/ICSI Cycles.

Hassani F, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Movaghar B, Fazel M Int J Fertil Steril. 2014; 7(2):108-15.

PMID: 24520472 PMC: 3850342.


Genome-wide histone state profiling of fibroblasts from the opossum, Monodelphis domestica, identifies the first marsupial-specific imprinted gene.

Douglas K, Wang X, Jasti M, Wolff A, VandeBerg J, Clark A BMC Genomics. 2014; 15:89.

PMID: 24484454 PMC: 3912494. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-89.


Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes.

Brandvain Y Am Nat. 2010; 176(4):511-21.

PMID: 20795831 PMC: 3151724. DOI: 10.1086/656272.


How demography, life history, and kinship shape the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Van Cleve J, Feldman M, Lehmann L Am Nat. 2010; 176(4):440-55.

PMID: 20738206 PMC: 2989731. DOI: 10.1086/656277.


References
1.
Hurst L . Is multiple paternity necessary for the evolution of genomic imprinting?. Genetics. 1999; 153(1):509-12. PMC: 1460751. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.509. View

2.
Spencer H . Population genetics and evolution of genomic imprinting. Annu Rev Genet. 2000; 34:457-477. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.457. View

3.
Reik W, Walter J . Evolution of imprinting mechanisms: the battle of the sexes begins in the zygote. Nat Genet. 2001; 27(3):255-6. DOI: 10.1038/85804. View

4.
Reik W, Davies K, Dean W, Kelsey G, Constancia M . Imprinted genes and the coordination of fetal and postnatal growth in mammals. Novartis Found Symp. 2001; 237:19-31; discussion 31-42. DOI: 10.1002/0470846666.ch3. View

5.
Moore T . Genetic conflict, genomic imprinting and establishment of the epigenotype in relation to growth. Reproduction. 2001; 122(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1220185. View