Effects of ISI and Stimulus Probability on Event-related Go/nogo Potentials After Somatosensory Stimulation

Overview

Journal Exp Brain Res

Specialty Neurology

Date 2004 Dec 16

PMID 15599719

Citations 12

Authors

Hiroki Nakata

Koji Inui

Toshiaki Wasaka

Yohei Tamura

Tetsuo Kida

Ryusuke Kakigi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The present study investigated the characteristics of the middle-latency negative potential of event-related potentials (ERPs) using somatosensory go/nogo tasks. We manipulated interstimulus interval (ISI) in Experiment 1 and stimulus probability in Experiment 2 and analyzed the subtracted difference waveform resulting from subtraction of the ERP evoked by the go stimulation from that evoked by the nogo stimulation. In Experiment 1, the peak latency of negativity became significantly longer as the ISI increased, but the peak amplitude was unchanged. The reaction time (RT) was longer with increasing ISI. In Experiment 2, manipulation of the stimulus probability yielded an increase in peak amplitude with decreasing probability of the nogo stimulus, but did not affect the latency. The RT increased as the probability of a nogo stimulus rose. Because manipulation of the ISI and stimulus probability elicited different brain activities, we hypothesized that manipulation of the ISI elicited a delay of the stimulus evaluation process including response inhibition, and that stimulus probability significantly affected the strength of the response inhibition process.

Citing Articles

Movement of the stimulated finger in a Go/NoGo task enhances attention directed to that finger as evidenced by P300 amplitude modulation.

Sugawara K, Akaiwa M, Matsuda Y, Shibata E, Saito H, Sasaki T Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1178509.

PMID: 38116232 PMC: 10728280. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1178509.

Transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation does not modulate Nogo N2 and Go/Nogo reaction times in somatosensory and auditory modalities.

Yamashiro K, Ikarashi K, Makibuchi T, Anazawa S, Baba Y, Fujimoto T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3014.

PMID: 36810889 PMC: 9944265. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30261-3.

Modality-specific improvements in sensory processing among baseball players.

Yamashiro K, Yamazaki Y, Siiya K, Ikarashi K, Baba Y, Otsuru N Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2248.

PMID: 33500460 PMC: 7838195. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81852-x.

Sensory gating, inhibition control and gamma oscillations in the human somatosensory cortex.

Cheng C, Chan P, Niddam D, Tsai S, Hsu S, Liu C Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20437.

PMID: 26843358 PMC: 4740805. DOI: 10.1038/srep20437.

Skill-Specific Changes in Somatosensory Nogo Potentials in Baseball Players.

Yamashiro K, Sato D, Onishi H, Sugawara K, Nakazawa S, Shimojo H PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0142581.

PMID: 26600391 PMC: 4657892. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142581.

References

BOTWINICK J, Thompson L . Premotor and motor components of reaction time. J Exp Psychol. 1966; 71(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1037/h0022634. View

Schluter N, Rushworth M, Passingham R, Mills K . Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1998; 121 ( Pt 5):785-99. DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.5.785. View

Filipovic S, Jahanshahi M, Rothwell J . Cortical potentials related to decision-making: comparison of two types of go/no-go decision. Neuroreport. 2000; 10(17):3583-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00022. View

Pfefferbaum A, Ford J, Weller B, KOPELL B . ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985; 60(5):423-34. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91017-x. View

Jodo E, Kayama Y . Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 82(6):477-82. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-l. View

Yamanaka K, Kimura T, Miyazaki M, Kawashima N, Nozaki D, Nakazawa K . Human cortical activities during Go/NoGo tasks with opposite motor control paradigms. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 142(3):301-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0943-2. View

Durston S, Thomas K, Worden M, Yang Y, Casey B . The effect of preceding context on inhibition: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2002; 16(2):449-53. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1074. View

Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J . ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999; 101(2-3):267-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00008-6. View

Leocani L, Cohen L, Wassermann E, Ikoma K, Hallett M . Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms. Brain. 2000; 123 ( Pt 6):1161-73. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.6.1161. View

10.

Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Takeshima Y, Watanabe S, Shimojo M . Temporal changes of pyramidal tract activities after decision of movement: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997; 105(4):255-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00019-2. View

11.

Garavan H, Ross T, Stein E . Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(14):8301-6. PMC: 22229. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301. View

12.

Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C . Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature. 1996; 381(6582):520-2. DOI: 10.1038/381520a0. View

13.

Sasaki K, Gemba H, Nambu A, Matsuzaki R . No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects. Neurosci Res. 1993; 18(3):249-52. DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(93)90062-u. View

14.

Polich J, Brock T, Geisler M . P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval. Int J Psychophysiol. 1991; 11(2):219-23. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(91)90015-p. View

15.

Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S . Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(12):2224-32. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00691-5. View

16.

Gemba H, Sasaki K . Potential related to no-go reaction of go/no-go hand movement task with color discrimination in human. Neurosci Lett. 1989; 101(3):263-8. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90543-0. View

17.

Falkenstein M, Koshlykova N, Kiroj V, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J . Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995; 96(1):36-43. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-k. View

18.

Gonsalvez C, Polich J . P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology. 2002; 39(3):388-96. DOI: 10.1017/s0048577201393137. View

19.

Doucet C, Stelmack R . The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. Psychophysiology. 1999; 36(3):351-63. DOI: 10.1017/s0048577299980563. View

20.

Kok A . Effects of degradation of visual stimulation on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biol Psychol. 1986; 23(1):21-38. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90087-6. View