» Articles » PMID: 25009493

The Timing of Cognitive Plasticity in Physiological Aging: a TDCS Study of Naming

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2014 Jul 11
PMID 25009493
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on physiologically aging adults performing a naming task. tDCS is a method that modulates human cortical excitability. Neuroplasticity is considered to have its foundation in cortical excitability as a property that adjusts the connection strength between neurons in the brain. Language efficiency, as all functions, relies on integration of information (i.e., effectiveness of connectivity) through neurons in the brain. So the use of tDCS, to modulate cortical excitability, can help to define the state of cognitive plasticity in the aging brain. Based on Hebb's rule, an increase in synaptic efficacy does not rely only on the increase of excitability but also on the timing of activation. Therefore, a key issue in this study is the timing of tDCS application in relation to a task: When to deliver tDCS to induce modulatory effects on task execution to facilitate naming. Anodal tDCS was applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of older and young adults before and during a naming task. In older adults, tDCS improved naming performance and decreased the verbal reaction times only if it was applied during the task execution, whereas in young subjects both stimulation conditions improved naming performance. These findings highlight that in healthy aging adults, the cerebral network dedicated to lexical retrieval processing may be facilitated only if stimulation is applied to an "active" neural network. We hypothesize that this change is due to the neuronal synaptic changes, in the aging brain, which reduce the window of when cortical excitability can facilitate synaptic efficacy and therefore plasticity.

Citing Articles

Behavioral and neural effects of temporoparietal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia: a preliminary study.

Granadillo E, Fellmeth M, Youssofzadeh V, Heffernan J, Shah-Basak P, Pillay S Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1492447.

PMID: 40070907 PMC: 11893574. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492447.


Effective engagement in computerized cognitive training for older adults.

Guimaraes A, Lin F, Panizzutti R, Turnbull A Ageing Res Rev. 2025; 104:102650.

PMID: 39755175 PMC: 11807753. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102650.


Investigating the neural mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation effects on human cognition: current issues and potential solutions.

Meinzer M, Shahbabaie A, Antonenko D, Blankenburg F, Fischer R, Hartwigsen G Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1389651.

PMID: 38957187 PMC: 11218740. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1389651.


Prefrontal theta-gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation improves non-declarative visuomotor learning in older adults.

Diedrich L, Kolhoff H, Chakalov I, Vekony T, Nemeth D, Antal A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4955.

PMID: 38418511 PMC: 10901881. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55125-2.


The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Static and Dynamic Balance of Inactive Elderly Men.

Parsaee S, Shohani M, Jalilian M Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023; 9:23337214231159760.

PMID: 36937706 PMC: 10021087. DOI: 10.1177/23337214231159760.


References
1.
Peters A, Sethares C, Luebke J . Synapses are lost during aging in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience. 2008; 152(4):970-81. PMC: 2441531. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.014. View

2.
Vidal-Pineiro D, Martin-Trias P, Arenaza-Urquijo E, Sala-Llonch R, Clemente I, Mena-Sanchez I . Task-dependent activity and connectivity predict episodic memory network-based responses to brain stimulation in healthy aging. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(2):287-96. PMC: 4517193. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.12.016. View

3.
Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W . Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007; 72(4-6):208-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. View

4.
Nitsche M, Nitsche M, Klein C, Tergau F, Rothwell J, Paulus W . Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114(4):600-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00412-1. View

5.
Siebner H, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche M, Paulus W, Lemon R . Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(13):3379-85. PMC: 6730024. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5316-03.2004. View