» Articles » PMID: 15560835

Do Different Implant Surfaces Exposed in the Oral Cavity of Humans Show Different Biofilm Compositions and Activities?

Overview
Journal Eur J Oral Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2004 Nov 25
PMID 15560835
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osseointegrated dental implants play an important role in restorative dentistry. However, plaque accumulation may cause inflammatory reactions around the implants, sometimes leading to implant failure. In this in vivo study the influence of two physical hard coatings on bacterial adhesion was examined in comparison with a pure titanium surface. Thin glass sheets coated with titanium nitride (TiN), zirconium nitride (ZrN) or pure titanium were mounted on removable intraoral splints in two adults. After 60 h of intraoral exposure, the biofilms were analyzed to determine the number of bacteria, the types of bacteria [by applying single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP analysis) of 16S rRNA genes], and whether or not the bacteria were active (by SSCP analysis of 16S rRNA). The results showed that bacterial cell counts were higher on the pure titanium-coated glass sheets than on the glass sheets coated with TiN or ZrN. The lowest number of bacterial cells was present on theZrN-coated glass. However, the metabolic activity (RNA fingerprints) of bacteria on TiN- and ZrN-coated glass sheets seemed to be lower than the activity of bacteria on the titanium-coated surfaces, whereas SSCP fingerprints based on 16S rDNA revealed that the major 16S bands are common to all of the fingerprints, independently of the surface coating.

Citing Articles

Effect of Abutment Material on aMMP-8 Levels in Peri-Implant Sulcular Fluid over 12 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Arefnia B, Theisen K, Steyer E, Lorenzoni M, Sokolowski A, Ubaidha Maheen C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941195 PMC: 11817154. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030264.


Application of PVD coatings in medical implantology for enhanced performance, biocompatibility, and quality of life.

Saad K, Saba T, Rashid A Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e35541.

PMID: 39220946 PMC: 11363861. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35541.


Characterization of the Oral Microbiome in Wearers of Fixed and Removable Implant or Non-Implant-Supported Prostheses in Healthy and Pathological Oral Conditions: A Narrative Review.

DAmbrosio F, Santella B, Di Palo M, Giordano F, Lo Giudice R Microorganisms. 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37110463 PMC: 10145620. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11041041.


Epithelial Biological Response to Machined Titanium vs. PVD Zirconium-Coated Titanium: An In Vitro Study.

Meme L, Sartini D, Pozzi V, Emanuelli M, Strappa E, Bittarello P Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(20).

PMID: 36295315 PMC: 9610795. DOI: 10.3390/ma15207250.


Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses.

Pawar R, Narote P, Gawai K, Amte M, Singh S, Sonkesriya S J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 14(Suppl 1):S812-S815.

PMID: 36110822 PMC: 9469461. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22.