» Articles » PMID: 15554750

The Treatment of Chronic Constipation in Elderly People: an Update

Overview
Journal Drugs Aging
Specialties Geriatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2004 Nov 24
PMID 15554750
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Constipation is a common problem in elderly persons, with prevalence ranging from 15% to 20% in the community-dwelling elderly population and up to 50% in some studies of nursing home residents. In these patients, constipation results from a combination of risk factors, such as reduced fibre and fluid intake, decreased physical activity resulting from chronic diseases and multiple medications. Despite the high prevalence of constipation, there is surprisingly little evidence available on which to base management decisions of this common condition. Increased fluid intake, regular physical activity and high fibre intake are usually proposed as first step nonpharmacological measures. However, adherence to these measures is limited and pharmacological treatment is frequently required. Data are too limited, especially in elderly persons, to formally recommend one class of laxatives over another or one agent over another within each class. However, bulk-forming and osmotic laxatives are usually recommended as first-line agents, even though data on their effectiveness are limited. The need to maintain good hydration is a limitation in the use of bulk-forming laxatives, in particular, in frail elderly patients. In these patients, polyethylene glycol, an osmotic agent, is an attractive alternative. In addition, it has been shown to relieve faecal impaction in frail patients with neurological disease. Its cost and potential danger in patients at high risk for aspiration is, however, a limitation. Stimulant laxatives are considered mainly as an intermittent treatment in patients who do not respond to bulk-forming or osmotic laxatives. Several promising compounds such as the new serotonin 5-HT4 receptor agonists (tegaserod, prucalopride) and neurotrophin-3 (NT3) have not been adequately tested in older individuals. They are not routinely used and their role in the management of constipation in these patients will be more precisely defined in the future. Other treatment options are available (acupuncture, biofeedback, botulinum toxin and surgery), but experience with these interventions in elderly patients is limited and their indications in this population remain to be clarified. Management of constipation in elderly persons depends largely on experience and beliefs. Several new compounds seem promising but will need to be specifically tested in this population before being recommended.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of elobixibat in combination with or switched from conventional treatments of chronic constipation: A retrospective observational study.

Eguchi T, Inatomi O, Shintani S, Momose K, Sako T, Takagi M JGH Open. 2024; 8(8):e70019.

PMID: 39193138 PMC: 11347617. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.70019.


Identification of Potential Diuretic and Laxative Drug Candidates from L. Bark through Mice Model Studies and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Docking Analysis.

Nazmul Islam M, Hasan M, Dey A, Bokshi B, Das A, Sadhu S Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:4409250.

PMID: 36193132 PMC: 9526662. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4409250.


Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Management in a Hospitalized Geriatric Patient with Constipation.

Muchtar N, Helianthi D, Nareswari I Med Acupunct. 2020; 32(2):116-120.

PMID: 32351665 PMC: 7187974. DOI: 10.1089/acu.2019.1401.


Constipation: Evaluation and Management.

Jani B, Marsicano E Mo Med. 2018; 115(3):236-240.

PMID: 30228729 PMC: 6140151.


Differential effects of dietary fibres on colonic barrier function in elderly individuals with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Ganda Mall J, Lofvendahl L, Lindqvist C, Brummer R, Keita A, Schoultz I Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):13404.

PMID: 30194322 PMC: 6128877. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31492-5.


References
1.
Irvine E, Ferrazzi S, Pare P, Thompson W, Rance L . Health-related quality of life in functional GI disorders: focus on constipation and resource utilization. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(8):1986-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05843.x. View

2.
Lembo A, Camilleri M . Chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(14):1360-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra020995. View

3.
Christie A, Culbert P, Guest J . Economic impact of low dose polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes compared with lactulose in the management of idiopathic constipation in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002; 20(1):49-60. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220010-00005. View

4.
Passmore A, Wilson-Davies K, Stoker C, Scott M . Chronic constipation in long stay elderly patients: a comparison of lactulose and a senna-fibre combination. BMJ. 1993; 307(6907):769-71. PMC: 1696423. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6907.769. View

5.
Jones M, Talley N, Nuyts G, Dubois D . Lack of objective evidence of efficacy of laxatives in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2002; 47(10):2222-30. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020131126397. View