» Articles » PMID: 15548624

Acetylcholine Dynamically Controls Spatial Integration in Marmoset Primary Visual Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2004 Nov 19
PMID 15548624
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent in vitro studies have shown that acetylcholine (ACh) selectively reduces the efficacy of lateral cortical connections via a muscarinic mechanism, while boosting the efficacy of thalamocortical/feed-forward connections via a nicotinic mechanism. This suggests that high levels of ACh should reduce center-surround interactions of neurons in primary visual cortex, making cells more reliant on feed-forward information. In line with this hypothesis, we show that local iontophoretic application of ACh in primate primary visual cortex reduced the extent of spatial integration, assessed by recording a neurons' length tuning. When ACh was externally applied, neurons' preferred length shifted toward shorter bars, showing reduced impact of the extra-classical receptive field. We fitted a difference and a ratio of Gaussian model to these data to determine the underlying mechanisms of this dynamic change of spatial integration. These models assume overlapping summation and suppression areas with different widths and gains to be responsible for spatial integration and size tuning. ACh significantly reduced the extent of the summation area, but had no significant effect on the extent of the suppression area. In line with previous studies, we also show that applying ACh enhanced the response in the majority of cells, especially in the later (sustained) part of the response. These findings are similar to effects of attention on neuronal activity. The natural release of ACh is strongly linked with states of arousal and attention. Our results may therefore be relevant to the neurobiological mechanism of attention.

Citing Articles

Environmental context sculpts spatial and temporal visual processing in thalamus.

Peelman K, Haider B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39091887 PMC: 11291113. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.26.605345.


Cholinergic modulation of sensory perception and plasticity.

Kunnath A, Gifford R, Wallace M Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 152:105323.

PMID: 37467908 PMC: 10424559. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105323.


Effects of involuntary and voluntary attention on critical spacing of visual crowding.

Bowen J, Alforque C, Silver M J Vis. 2023; 23(3):2.

PMID: 36862108 PMC: 9987171. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.3.2.


Attention improves information flow between neuronal populations without changing the communication subspace.

Srinath R, Ruff D, Cohen M Curr Biol. 2021; 31(23):5299-5313.e4.

PMID: 34699782 PMC: 8665027. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.076.


Circuit mechanisms for the chemical modulation of cortex-wide network interactions and behavioral variability.

Pfeffer T, Ponce-Alvarez A, Tsetsos K, Meindertsma T, Gahnstrom C, van den Brink R Sci Adv. 2021; 7(29).

PMID: 34272245 PMC: 8284895. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf5620.


References
1.
Everitt B, Robbins T . Central cholinergic systems and cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997; 48:649-84. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.649. View

2.
Sarter M, Bruno J . Cognitive functions of cortical acetylcholine: toward a unifying hypothesis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997; 23(1-2):28-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(96)00009-4. View

3.
Kimura F, Baughman R . Distinct muscarinic receptor subtypes suppress excitatory and inhibitory synaptic responses in cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 77(2):709-16. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.709. View

4.
Robbins T . Arousal systems and attentional processes. Biol Psychol. 1997; 45(1-3):57-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05222-2. View

5.
CONNOR C, Preddie D, Gallant J, Van Essen D . Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4. J Neurosci. 1997; 17(9):3201-14. PMC: 6573654. View