» Articles » PMID: 15539470

Encounters Between Dynamic Cortical Microtubules Promote Ordering of the Cortical Array Through Angle-dependent Modifications of Microtubule Behavior

Overview
Journal Plant Cell
Specialties Biology
Cell Biology
Date 2004 Nov 13
PMID 15539470
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ordered cortical microtubule arrays are essential for normal plant morphogenesis, but how these arrays form is unclear. The dynamics of individual cortical microtubules are stochastic and cannot fully account for the observed order; however, using tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells expressing either the MBD-DsRed (microtubule binding domain of the mammalian MAP4 fused to the Discosoma sp red fluorescent protein) or YFP-TUA6 (yellow fluorescent protein fused to the Arabidopsis alpha-tubulin 6 isoform) microtubule markers, we identified intermicrotubule interactions that modify their stochastic behaviors. The intermicrotubule interactions occur when the growing plus-ends of cortical microtubules encounter previously existing cortical microtubules. Importantly, the outcome of such encounters depends on the angle at which they occur: steep-angle collisions are characterized by approximately sevenfold shorter microtubule contact times compared with shallow-angle encounters, and steep-angle collisions are twice as likely to result in microtubule depolymerization. Hence, steep-angle collisions promote microtubule destabilization, whereas shallow-angle encounters promote both microtubule stabilization and coalignment. Monte Carlo modeling of the behavior of simulated microtubules, according to the observed behavior of transverse and longitudinally oriented cortical microtubules in cells, reveals that these simple rules for intermicrotubule interactions are necessary and sufficient to facilitate the self-organization of dynamic microtubules into a parallel configuration.

Citing Articles

Microtubule flexibility, microtubule-based nucleation and ROP pattern co-alignment enhance protoxylem microtubule patterning.

Jacobs B, Saltini M, Molenaar J, Filion L, Deinum E Quant Plant Biol. 2025; 6:e2.

PMID: 39944474 PMC: 11811878. DOI: 10.1017/qpb.2024.17.


Self-organization of mortal filaments and its role in bacterial division ring formation.

Vanhille-Campos C, Whitley K, Radler P, Loose M, Holden S, Saric A Nat Phys. 2024; 20(10):1670-1678.

PMID: 39416851 PMC: 11473364. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02597-8.


Damage-repair events increase the instability of cortical microtubules in Arabidopsis.

Yan Y, Dai L, Wang T, Zhang Y Mol Biol Cell. 2024; 35(6):ar86.

PMID: 38656813 PMC: 11238082. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E23-11-0461.


Microtubule-associated phase separation of MIDD1 tunes cell wall spacing in xylem vessels in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Higa T, Kijima S, Sasaki T, Takatani S, Asano R, Kondo Y Nat Plants. 2024; 10(1):100-117.

PMID: 38172572 DOI: 10.1038/s41477-023-01593-9.


Confined-microtubule assembly shapes three-dimensional cell wall structures in xylem vessels.

Sasaki T, Saito K, Inoue D, Serk H, Sugiyama Y, Pesquet E Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6987.

PMID: 37957173 PMC: 10643555. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42487-w.


References
1.
Gardiner J, Harper J, Weerakoon N, Collings D, Ritchie S, Gilroy S . A 90-kD phospholipase D from tobacco binds to microtubules and the plasma membrane. Plant Cell. 2001; 13(9):2143-58. PMC: 139457. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010114. View

2.
Wasteneys G, Galway M . Remodeling the cytoskeleton for growth and form: an overview with some new views. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003; 54:691-722. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134818. View

3.
Tian G, Smith D, Gluck S, Baskin T . Higher plant cortical microtubule array analyzed in vitro in the presence of the cell wall. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2003; 57(1):26-36. DOI: 10.1002/cm.10153. View

4.
McNiven M, PORTER K . Organization of microtubules in centrosome-free cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1988; 106(5):1593-605. PMC: 2115052. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.106.5.1593. View

5.
Wasteneys G . Microtubule organization in the green kingdom: chaos or self-order?. J Cell Sci. 2002; 115(Pt 7):1345-54. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115.7.1345. View