» Articles » PMID: 15520267

Genomic Heterogeneity of Background Substitutional Patterns in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Nov 3
PMID 15520267
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutation is the underlying force that provides the variation upon which evolutionary forces can act. It is important to understand how mutation rates vary within genomes and how the probabilities of fixation of new mutations vary as well. If substitutional processes across the genome are heterogeneous, then examining patterns of coding sequence evolution without taking these underlying variations into account may be misleading. Here we present the first rigorous test of substitution rate heterogeneity in the Drosophila melanogaster genome using almost 1500 nonfunctional fragments of the transposable element DNAREP1_DM. Not only do our analyses suggest that substitutional patterns in heterochromatic and euchromatic sequences are different, but also they provide support in favor of a recombination-associated substitutional bias toward G and C in this species. The magnitude of this bias is entirely sufficient to explain recombination-associated patterns of codon usage on the autosomes of the D. melanogaster genome. We also document a bias toward lower GC content in the pattern of small insertions and deletions (indels). In addition, the GC content of noncoding DNA in Drosophila is higher than would be predicted on the basis of the pattern of nucleotide substitutions and small indels. However, we argue that the fast turnover of noncoding sequences in Drosophila makes it difficult to assess the importance of the GC biases in nucleotide substitutions and small indels in shaping the base composition of noncoding sequences.

Citing Articles

The genetic basis of variation in immune defense against Lysinibacillus fusiformis infection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Smith B, Patch K, Gupta A, Knoles E, Unckless R PLoS Pathog. 2023; 19(8):e1010934.

PMID: 37549163 PMC: 10434897. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010934.


The Shift in Synonymous Codon Usage Reveals Similar Genomic Variation during Domestication of Asian and African Rice.

Xiao G, Zhou J, Huo Z, Wu T, Li Y, Li Y Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).

PMID: 36361651 PMC: 9656316. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112860.


Alteration of synonymous codon usage bias accompanies polyploidization in wheat.

Tian G, Xiao G, Wu T, Zhou J, Xu W, Wang Y Front Genet. 2022; 13:979902.

PMID: 36313462 PMC: 9614214. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.979902.


The Linkage-Disequilibrium and Recombinational Landscape in Daphnia pulex.

Lynch M, Ye Z, Urban L, Maruki T, Wei W Genome Biol Evol. 2022; 14(11).

PMID: 36170345 PMC: 9642108. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evac145.


A simulation study to examine the impact of recombination on phylogenomic inferences under the multispecies coalescent model.

Zhu T, Flouri T, Yang Z Mol Ecol. 2022; 31(10):2814-2829.

PMID: 35313033 PMC: 9321900. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16433.


References
1.
Nachman M . Variation in recombination rate across the genome: evidence and implications. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002; 12(6):657-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-437x(02)00358-1. View

2.
Kimura M . On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962; 47:713-9. PMC: 1210364. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. View

3.
Petrov D, Aminetzach Y, Davis J, Bensasson D, Hirsh A . Size matters: non-LTR retrotransposable elements and ectopic recombination in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20(6):880-92. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg102. View

4.
Hellmann I, Ebersberger I, Ptak S, Paabo S, Przeworski M . A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 72(6):1527-35. PMC: 1180312. DOI: 10.1086/375657. View

5.
Kapitonov V, Jurka J . Molecular paleontology of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(11):6569-74. PMC: 164487. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0732024100. View