» Articles » PMID: 15461890

Infections Associated with Prosthetic Knee and Prosthetic Hip

Overview
Date 2004 Oct 6
PMID 15461890
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arthroplasty of the knee and hip is a common procedure. There is a risk of infection with primary arthroplasty, with an incidence of 1% to 2%. Significant cost and morbidity are associated with infection of the prosthetic joint. Most infections (60% to 70%) are caused by staphylococci, but approximately 10% are caused by streptococci and/or enterococci, whereas the remainder are caused by gram-negative enteric aerobes or anaerobic flora. Surgical revision is often required for cure because the biofilm that adheres to the infected prosthesis precludes antibiotic therapy from being effective. Biofilm formation occurs consistently as a consequence of host protein deposition on the prostheses, which serve as ligands for bacterial receptors. Once established, biofilm infections require removal of the prosthesis in order to effect a cure. Clinical and radiologic features are not specific for the diagnosis. Culture is specific but not sensitive enough to establish a pathogen in all cases. Surgical approaches are varied and range from debridement with retention of the prostheses to amputation of the limb. The most favored approach is the two-stage delayed reimplantation, in which patients receive specific antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks or more. Several additional antibiotics other than vancomycin are available for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infection, but these are still unproven in the treatment of osteomyelitis or prosthetic joint infection.

Citing Articles

The '2-in-1' stage: indications, technique & results.

Walmsley P Ann Jt. 2024; 7:7.

PMID: 38529137 PMC: 10929305. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-20-83.


Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Rare Case Report.

Sarzaeem M, Beigi A, Tavakoli Darestani R, Omrani F, Baroutkoub M, Manafi Rasi A Adv Biomed Res. 2023; 11:111.

PMID: 36798917 PMC: 9926025. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_302_21.


Exebacase: A Novel Approach to the Treatment of Staphylococcal Infections.

McCarthy M Drugs R D. 2022; 22(2):113-117.

PMID: 35175568 PMC: 9167414. DOI: 10.1007/s40268-022-00383-6.


Fungal periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Jakobs O, Schoof B, Klatte T, Schmidl S, Fensky F, Guenther D Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015; 7(1):5623.

PMID: 25874061 PMC: 4387362. DOI: 10.4081/or.2015.5623.


In vitro assessment of nanosilver-functionalized PMMA bone cement on primary human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts.

Pauksch L, Hartmann S, Szalay G, Alt V, Lips K PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114740.

PMID: 25485700 PMC: 4259364. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114740.


References
1.
Spangehl M, Masri B, OConnell J, Duncan C . Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(5):672-83. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199905000-00008. View

2.
Darouiche R . Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(14):1422-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra035415. View

3.
Larikka M, Ahonen A, Junila J, Niemela O, Hamalainen M, Syrjala H . Improved method for detecting knee replacement infections based on extended combined 99mTc-white blood cell/bone imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 2001; 22(10):1145-50. DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200110000-00015. View

4.
Tunney M, Patrick S, Curran M, Ramage G, Hanna D, Nixon J . Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37(10):3281-90. PMC: 85548. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.10.3281-3290.1999. View

5.
Weissman B . Imaging of total hip replacement. Radiology. 1997; 202(3):611-23. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051004. View