» Articles » PMID: 12151900

Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2002 Aug 2
PMID 12151900
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A prospective study of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for frozen sections against cultures obtained at the time of revision total joint replacement was done. One hundred twenty-one revision total joint replacements were done in 92 men and 29 women. A positive frozen section with more than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field was compared with the intraoperative cultures. Twenty-one patients who had revision surgery had greater than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field. Of these, 14 patients had positive cultures. The remaining 100 patients had less than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field, but seven had positive cultures. Statistical analysis of frozen sections for all total joint arthroplasties revealed a 67% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 67% positive predictive value, and 93% negative predictive value. Analysis of frozen sections for total hip arthroplasties revealed a 45% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 55% positive predictive value, and 88% negative predictive value. Analysis for total knee arthroplasties revealed 100% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 82% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. Comparisons of sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value between total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty were significant. The results indicate that the use of intraoperative frozen section analysis with greater than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field as an indication of infection lacks the positive predictive value and sensitivity for accurate determination of prosthetic infection at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty. Frozen sections have an acceptable sensitivity and positive predictive value in total knee arthroplasty. The results of the current study show the limitation of using frozen sections as a diagnostic test for infection in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Citing Articles

Should we rely on frozen section during the reimplantation stage of revision knee arthroplasty?.

Kilicarslan A, Yuksel K, Sungu N North Clin Istanb. 2024; 11(2):99-104.

PMID: 38757108 PMC: 11095333. DOI: 10.14744/nci.2023.90699.


The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

Trenkwalder K, Erichsen S, Weisemann F, Augat P, Militz M, von Ruden C J Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 24(1):25.

PMID: 37308767 PMC: 10260706. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00708-4.


Diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil counts in histopathological tissue analysis in periprosthetic joint infection using the ICM, IDSA, and EBJIS criteria.

Sigmund I, McNally M, Luger M, Bohler C, Windhager R, Sulzbacher I Bone Joint Res. 2021; 10(8):536-547.

PMID: 34409845 PMC: 8414440. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.108.BJR-2021-0058.R1.


Diagnostic algorithm in septic total knee arthroplasty failure - What is evidence-based?.

Suren C, Lazic I, Stephan M, Lenze F, Pohlig F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R J Orthop. 2021; 23:208-215.

PMID: 33603316 PMC: 7868686. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.020.


Primarily treated patients versus referred patients in the treatment of native septic arthritis of digits: a retrospective comparative study.

Kwak S, Bae J, Oh Y, Jang H, Ahn T, Lee S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):780.

PMID: 33246444 PMC: 7697366. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03770-9.