» Articles » PMID: 15364832

Extensive Left Ventricular Remodeling Does Not Allow Viable Myocardium to Improve in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Revascularization and is Associated with Worse Long-term Prognosis

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2004 Sep 15
PMID 15364832
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extensive left ventricular (LV) remodeling may not allow functional recovery after revascularization, despite the presence of viable myocardium.

Methods And Results: Seventy-nine consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricle ejection fraction [LVEF] 29+/-7%) underwent surgical revascularization. Before revascularization, viability was assessed by metabolic imaging with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose and SPECT. LV volumes and LVEF were assessed by resting echocardiography. LVEF was re-assessed by echocardiography 8 to 12 months after revascularization. Three-year clinical follow-up (events: cardiac death, infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure) was also obtained. Forty-nine patients had substantial viability; 5 died before re-assessment of LVEF. Of the remaining 44 patients, 24 improved > or =5% in LVEF after revascularization, whereas 20 did not improve in LVEF. LV end-systolic volume was the only parameter that was significantly different between the groups (109+/-46 mL for the improvers versus 141+/-31 mL for the nonimprovers; P<0.05). The change in LVEF after revascularization was linearly related to the baseline LV end-systolic volume, with a higher LV end-systolic volume associated with a low likelihood of improvement in LVEF after revascularization. During the 3-year follow-up, the highest event-rate (67%) was observed in patients without viable myocardium with a large LV size, whereas the lowest event rate (5%) was observed in patients with viable myocardium and a small LV size. Intermediate event rates were observed in patients with viable myocardium and a large LV size (38%), and in patients without viable myocardium and a small LV size (24%).

Conclusions: Extensive LV remodeling prohibits improvement in LVEF after revascularization and affects long-term prognosis negatively, despite the presence of viability.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes and Left Ventricular Functional Remodeling after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study of 76 Cases.

Dong Y, Xu Z, Dai X, Chen L, Lin Z Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(9):317.

PMID: 39355578 PMC: 11440416. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2509317.


Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy With Reduced Left Ventricular Function Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Arjomandi Rad A, Tserioti E, Magouliotis D, Vardanyan R, Samiotis I, Skoularigis J Clin Cardiol. 2024; 47(7):e24307.

PMID: 38953367 PMC: 11217808. DOI: 10.1002/clc.24307.


Effects of different surgical strategies and left ventricular remodelling on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

Cao J, Yu M, Xiao Y, Dong R, Wang J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1398700.

PMID: 38895539 PMC: 11183324. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1398700.


A feasibility study of [18F]F-AraG positron emission tomography (PET) for cardiac imaging - myocardial viability in ischemia-reperfusion injury model.

Shrestha U, Chae H, Fang Q, Lee R, Packiasamy J, Huynh L Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38746162 PMC: 11092840. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4244476/v1.


Selecting the appropriate patients for coronary artery bypass grafting in ischemic cardiomyopathy-importance of myocardial viability.

Varma P, Radhakrishnan R, Gopal K, Krishna N, Jose R Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024; 40(3):341-352.

PMID: 38681722 PMC: 11045715. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-023-01671-9.