Drug-drug Interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase Substrates: a Pharmacokinetic Explanation for Typically Observed Low Exposure (AUCi/AUC) Ratios
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Glucuronidation is a listed clearance mechanism for 1 in 10 of the top 200 prescribed drugs. The objective of this article is to encourage those studying ligand interactions with UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) to adequately consider the potential consequences of in vitro UGT inhibition in humans. Spurred on by interest in developing potent and selective inhibitors for improved confidence around UGT reaction phenotyping, and the increased availability of recombinant forms of human UGTs, several recent studies have reported in vitro inhibition of UGT enzymes. In some cases, the observed potency of UGT inhibitors in vitro has been interpreted as having potential relevance in humans via pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Although there are reported examples of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions for UGT substrates, exposure increases of the aglycone are rarely greater than 100% in the presence of an inhibitor relative to its absence (i.e., AUCi/AUC < or = 2). This small magnitude in change is in contrast to drugs primarily cleared by cytochrome P450 enzymes, where exposures have been reported to increase as much as 35-fold on coadministration with an inhibitor (e.g., ketoconazole inhibition of CYP3A4-catalyzed terfenadine metabolism). In this article the evidence for purported clinical relevance of potent in vitro inhibition of UGT enzymes will be assessed, taking the following into account: in vitro data on the enzymology of glucuronide formation from aglycone, pharmacokinetic principles based on empirical data for inhibition of metabolism, and clinical data on the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of drugs primarily cleared by glucuronidation.
Functional Verification of Differentially Expressed Genes Following DENV2 Infection in .
Chen X, Zhou X, Xie X, Li B, Zhao T, Yu H Viruses. 2025; 17(1).
PMID: 39861856 PMC: 11769442. DOI: 10.3390/v17010067.
Vera-Lopez K, Aguilar-Pineda J, Moscoso-Palacios R, Davila-Del-Carpio G, Manrique-Murillo J, Gomez B Molecules. 2025; 30(2).
PMID: 39860203 PMC: 11767965. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30020333.
Palmen R, Walton M, Wagner J Front Pharmacol. 2025; 15:1477485.
PMID: 39741635 PMC: 11686437. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1477485.
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent toxicity by retene requires metabolic competence.
Rude C, Wilson L, La Du J, Lalli P, Colby S, Schultz K Toxicol Sci. 2024; 202(1):50-68.
PMID: 39107868 PMC: 11514837. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae098.
Subash S, Ahire D, Patel M, Shaikh S, Singh D, Deshmukh S Pharm Res. 2024; 41(8):1621-1630.
PMID: 39107514 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03750-x.