» Articles » PMID: 15302117

Precision Grasps of Children and Young and Old Adults: Individual Differences in Digit Contact Strategy, Purchase Pattern, and Digit Posture

Overview
Journal Behav Brain Res
Date 2004 Aug 11
PMID 15302117
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evolutionary origins and variations of the precision grip, in which an object is held between the thumb and other digits, are poorly understood. This is surprising because the neural basis of this grasp pattern, including the motor cortex and pyramidal tract have received extensive study. Most previous work has shown that features of an object to be grasped (external factors) determine grasp patterns. The objective of the present study was to investigate individual differences (central factors) in use of the pincer and other precision grips. The grasping patterns of male and female young adults, older adults and children were examined as they reached (with both left and right hand) for five small beads (3-16 mm diameter). Frame-by-frame analysis of grasping indicated a high degree of variability in digit contact strategies, purchase patterns and digit posture both within and between subjects. (1) The contact strategies consisted of five variations, depending on whether the thumb or the index finger dragged or stabilized the bead for grasping. (2) Purchase patterns consisted of seven different types of precision grips, involving the thumb and various combinations of other digits. (3) There were four variations stemming from the posture of the non-grasping digits. Grip patterns of the left and right hands were correlated in individual subjects, as were strategies used for different bead sizes. Females displayed slightly more variability in grasp patterns than did males, and digit width (obtained from photocopies of the subjects' hands) was weakly correlated with the grasp patterns used. Although it was expected that the pincer would be used for all objects, it was preferentially used for only the smallest object except for older adults who used the pincer grasp on most objects. The variability in digit contact strategies, purchase patterns, and posture of the non-grasping digits indicates that central factors (innate or learning-induced architecture of the left parietal cortex) make important contributions to the selection of a grasping pattern. These individual differences are discussed in relation to the neural control of grasping and its potential contribution to understanding the evolution, development, and pathology of the precision grip.

Citing Articles

The Bead Maze Hand Function Test for Children.

Rose V, Ajoy A, Johnston C, Gogola G, Parikh P Am J Occup Ther. 2024; 78(4).

PMID: 38900916 PMC: 11220783. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050584.


Hand Grasping Synergies As Biometrics.

Patel V, Thukral P, Burns M, Florescu I, Chandramouli R, Vinjamuri R Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017; 5:26.

PMID: 28512630 PMC: 5411425. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00026.


The modulation of the motor resonance triggered by reach-to-grasp movements: No role of human physical similarity as conveyed by age.

Marino B, Ricciardelli P Exp Brain Res. 2017; 235(7):2267-2286.

PMID: 28474093 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4960-1.


Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Whishaw I, Karl J, Humphrey N Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(8):2351-62.

PMID: 27056084 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4640-6.


The c.429_452 duplication of the ARX gene: a unique developmental-model of limb kinetic apraxia.

Curie A, Nazir T, Brun A, Paulignan Y, Reboul A, Delange K Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014; 9:25.

PMID: 24528893 PMC: 4016261. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-9-25.