» Articles » PMID: 27056084

Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the Destriate (V1) Monkey Helen: a New Anatomy for the Dual Visuomotor Channel Theory of Reaching

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Apr 9
PMID 27056084
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dual visuomotor channel theory proposes that reaching depends on two neural pathways that extend from visual cortex (V1) to motor cortex via the parietal lobe. The Reach pathway directs the hand to the target's location and the Grasp pathway shapes the hand and digits for purchase. Sighted human participants integrate the Reach and the Grasp, but without vision they dissociate the movements to capitalize on tactile cues. They use a Reach with a relatively open hand to locate the target and then they use touch cues to shape the fingers to Grasp. After a V1 lesion, the rhesus monkey, Helen, learned to make near-normal visual discriminations based on size and brightness but displayed visual agnosia. She also learned to reach for food with her mouth and her hands. The present analysis of film of her reaching behavior shows that she dissociated the Reach and the Grasp, as do unsighted human participants reaching for a food target at a fixed location. Her rapid and direct Reach was made with an open hand and extended fingers to contact the food with the palm whereas her Grasp was initiated after she touched the food. She also visually fixated the target during the Reach and visually disengaged after target contact, as do sighted human participants. In contrast, Helen did integrate the Reach and the Grasp to take food from her mouth, demonstrating that she could integrate the movements using online tactile cues. The finding that extrastriate pathways can direct the hand toward extrinsic target properties (location) but not intrinsic target properties (size and shape) is discussed as a novel addition to dual visuomotor channel theory.

Citing Articles

The control of movement gradually transitions from feedback control to feedforward adaptation throughout childhood.

Malone L, Hill N, Tripp H, Zipunnikov V, Wolpert D, Bastian A NPJ Sci Learn. 2025; 10(1):13.

PMID: 40069149 PMC: 11897242. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-025-00304-7.


Touch the table before the target: contact with an underlying surface may assist the development of precise visually controlled reach and grasp movements in human infants.

Karl J, Wilson A, Bertoli M, Shubear N Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(8):2185-2207.

PMID: 29797280 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5293-4.


Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Kuntz J, Karl J, Doan J, Whishaw I Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(4):1091-1103.

PMID: 29441469 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5196-4.


Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans.

Karl J, Kuntz J, Lenhart L, Whishaw I J Vis Exp. 2018; (131).

PMID: 29364272 PMC: 5908648. DOI: 10.3791/56733.


Organization of the reach and grasp in head-fixed vs freely-moving mice provides support for multiple motor channel theory of neocortical organization.

Whishaw I, Faraji J, Kuntz J, Agha B, Patel M, Metz G Exp Brain Res. 2017; 235(6):1919-1932.

PMID: 28315945 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4925-4.

References
1.
Cowey A . Atrophy of retinal ganglion cells after removal of striate cortex in a rhesus monkey. Perception. 1974; 3(3):257-60. DOI: 10.1068/p030257. View

2.
Graziano M, Taylor C, Moore T . Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex. Neuron. 2002; 34(5):841-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00698-0. View

3.
Philipp R, Hoffmann K . Arm movements induced by electrical microstimulation in the superior colliculus of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(9):3350-63. PMC: 6795300. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-13.2014. View

4.
Perenin M, Rossetti Y . Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field. Neuroreport. 1996; 7(3):793-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199602290-00027. View

5.
Stepniewska I, Gharbawie O, Burish M, Kaas J . Effects of muscimol inactivations of functional domains in motor, premotor, and posterior parietal cortex on complex movements evoked by electrical stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 111(5):1100-19. PMC: 3949230. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00491.2013. View