» Articles » PMID: 15238522

Evidence for Multiple Cycles of Strand Invasion During Repair of Double-strand Gaps in Drosophila

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Jul 9
PMID 15238522
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a major source of genome instability, are often repaired through homologous recombination pathways. Models for these pathways have been proposed, but the precise mechanisms and the rules governing their use remain unclear. In Drosophila, the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model can explain most DSB repair. To investigate SDSA, we induced DSBs by excision of a P element from the male X chromosome, which produces a 14-kb gap relative to the sister chromatid. In wild-type males, repair synthesis tracts are usually long, resulting in frequent restoration of the P element. However, repair synthesis is often incomplete, resulting in internally deleted P elements. We examined the effects of mutations in spn-A, which encodes the Drosophila Rad51 ortholog. As expected, there is little or no repair synthesis in homozygous spn-A mutants after P excision. However, heterozygosity for spn-A mutations also resulted in dramatic reductions in the lengths of repair synthesis tracts. These findings support a model in which repair DNA synthesis is not highly processive. We discuss a model wherein repair of a double-strand gap requires multiple cycles of strand invasion, synthesis, and dissociation of the nascent strand. After dissociation, the nascent strand may anneal to a complementary single strand, reinvade a template to be extended by additional synthesis, or undergo end joining. This model can explain aborted SDSA repair events and the prevalence of internally deleted transposable elements in genomes.

Citing Articles

REV1 coordinates a multi-faceted tolerance response to DNA alkylation damage and prevents chromosome shattering in Drosophila melanogaster.

Khodaverdian V, Sano T, Maggs L, Tomarchio G, Dias A, Tran M PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(7):e1011181.

PMID: 39074150 PMC: 11309488. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011181.


Double-Stranded Break Repair in Mammalian Cells and Precise Genome Editing.

Ali A, Xiao W, Babar M, Bi Y Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(5).

PMID: 35627122 PMC: 9142082. DOI: 10.3390/genes13050737.


Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase.

Newman T, Beltran B, McGehee J, Elnatan D, Cahoon C, Paddy M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(12):e2115883119.

PMID: 35302885 PMC: 8944930. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115883119.


Homology-directed repair involves multiple strand invasion cycles in fission yeast.

Vines A, Cox K, Leland B, King M Mol Biol Cell. 2022; 33(4):ar30.

PMID: 35080989 PMC: 9250353. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E20-07-0433.


Repeated strand invasion and extensive branch migration are hallmarks of meiotic recombination.

Ahuja J, Harvey C, Wheeler D, Lichten M Mol Cell. 2021; 81(20):4258-4270.e4.

PMID: 34453891 PMC: 8541907. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.003.


References
1.
Haber J . Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break. Trends Genet. 2000; 16(6):259-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02022-9. View

2.
Yan X, Kavchok S, Dooner H . Origination of Ds elements from Ac elements in maize: evidence for rare repair synthesis at the site of Ac excision. Genetics. 1999; 152(4):1733-40. PMC: 1460708. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1733. View

3.
Lander E, Linton L, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody M, Baldwin J . Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001; 409(6822):860-921. DOI: 10.1038/35057062. View

4.
Preston C, Engels W, Flores C . Efficient repair of DNA breaks in Drosophila: evidence for single-strand annealing and competition with other repair pathways. Genetics. 2002; 161(2):711-20. PMC: 1462149. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/161.2.711. View

5.
Thompson L, Schild D . Recombinational DNA repair and human disease. Mutat Res. 2002; 509(1-2):49-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00224-5. View