» Articles » PMID: 15165016

Lower Limb Salvage Surgery with MUTARS Endoprostheses: 2 to 7 Year Results

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2004 May 29
PMID 15165016
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reconstruction of bone defects remains a challenge in orthopaedic oncology. Allogenic and autologous bone grafts, as well as megaprostheses are well-recognised methods for bone reconstruction. Modular, both cemented and cementless, endoprosthetic systems have become more popular to bridge defects of different sizes. The clinical and radiological results of 50 consecutive patients treated with MUTARS endoprostheses between 1995 and 2000 were evaluated in a prospective clinical study. The average follow-up was 46 months (25-86 months). Clinical evaluation showed good results with an average Enneking-Score of 72% (33-100%, SD +/- 19). Radiological evaluation showed various patterns of bone remodelling including extracortical bone bridging. Early symptomatic loosening occurred in 11 cases, necessitating revision surgery. In conclusion, the use of the MUTARS Endoprosthesis may be a valuable tool in the treatment of major bone defects in the lower limb, if the problems with the first-generation design can be solved.

Citing Articles

The history of resection prosthesis.

Crimi A, Joyce D, Binitie O, Ruggieri P, Letson G Int Orthop. 2023; 47(3):873-883.

PMID: 36651984 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05698-w.


Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery.

Pala E, Trovarelli G, Angelini A, Maraldi M, Berizzi A, Ruggieri P Acta Biomed. 2017; 88(2S):129-138.

PMID: 28657574 PMC: 6179001. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v88i2 -S.6523.


Distal femur reconstruction with modular tumour prostheses: a single Institution analysis of implant survival comparing fixed versus rotating hinge knee prostheses.

Pala E, Trovarelli G, Angelini A, Ruggieri P Int Orthop. 2016; 40(10):2171-2180.

PMID: 27259557 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3232-1.


lower limbs kinematic assessment of the effect of a gym and hydrotherapy rehabilitation protocol after knee megaprosthesis: a case report.

Lovecchio N, Sciume L, Zago M, Panella L, Lopresti M, Sforza C J Phys Ther Sci. 2016; 28(3):1064-70.

PMID: 27134413 PMC: 4842425. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.1064.


Load and failure behavior of human muscle samples in the context of proximal femur replacement.

Schleifenbaum S, Schmidt M, Mobius R, Wolfskampf T, Schroder C, Grunert R BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17:149.

PMID: 27048598 PMC: 4822308. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0998-7.