» Articles » PMID: 15129699

[18F]FDG in Recurrent Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Performances, Clinical Impact and Relevance of Induced Changes in Management

Overview
Date 2004 May 8
PMID 15129699
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impact and the relevance of induced changes in management. Patients (n = 134) with suspicion of recurrence either clinically or on conventional imaging (suspected recurrence: SR) or with an isolated increase in tumour marker levels (occult recurrence: OR) underwent FDG-GPET on a coincidence gamma camera. The reference standard for evaluation of accuracy, either histology (n = 26) or follow-up for 1 year (n = 49), was available in 75 (56%) patients. A questionnaire was sent to the referring clinician to evaluate the impact of FDG on management. Responses were obtained for 75 patients. Information regarding both approaches was available for 46 patients (46/134 = 34%). At the patient level, the sensitivity of FDG-GPET was 84%, significantly higher than the 63% sensitivity for conventional modalities, and the specificity was 78% versus 61%. The values for FDG-GPET were 81% and 86% respectively in the SR group and 90% and 73% respectively in the OR group, without any significant difference between these settings. The rate of change in management was 44% overall, 43% in the SR group and 45% in the OR group. Within the two groups, intermodality (major) changes were more frequent than intramodality (minor) changes. In the 46 patients for whom both approaches were available, 93% of management modifications were relevant (validated by biopsy or clinical follow-up). The results of this retrospective study show that FDG-GPET has an important role to play in patient management by confirming and evaluating the extent of recurrence or by localising occult recurrence.

Citing Articles

F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital.

Le Goubey J, Lasnon C, Nakouri I, Cesaire L, de Pontville M, Nganoa C Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34359281 PMC: 8304093. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071198.


Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in suspected recurrence of male breast cancer.

Vadi S, Mittal B, Sood A, Singh G, Bal A, Parihar A Nucl Med Commun. 2018; 40(1):63-72.

PMID: 30312217 PMC: 6282661. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000928.


Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer.

Taghipour M, Sheikhbahaei S, Trahan T, Subramaniam R Nucl Med Commun. 2016; 37(6):602-8.

PMID: 27110955 PMC: 4898188. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000491.


The utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrent breast cancer: impact and prognostic stratification.

Cochet A, David S, Moodie K, Drummond E, Dutu G, MacManus M Cancer Imaging. 2015; 14:13.

PMID: 25608599 PMC: 4331819. DOI: 10.1186/1470-7330-14-13.


Role of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the post-therapy surveillance of breast cancer.

Chang H, Hu C, Chiu Y, Peng N, Liu R PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e115127.

PMID: 25517451 PMC: 4269411. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115127.


References
1.
Kim T, Moon W, Lee D, Chung J, Lee M, Youn Y . Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. World J Surg. 2001; 25(7):829-34. DOI: 10.1007/s002680020095. View

2.
Pecking A, Alberini J, Floiras J, Goupil A, Pichon M . Detection of occult disease in breast cancer using fluorodeoxyglucose camera-based positron emission tomography. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002; 2(3):229-34. DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2001.n.026. View

3.
Kadrmas D, Christian P . Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43(11):1545-54. View

4.
Landoni C, Gianolli L, Lucignani G, Magnani P, Savi A, Travaini L . Comparison of dual-head coincidence PET versus ring PET in tumor patients. J Nucl Med. 1999; 40(10):1617-22. View

5.
Colomer R, Ruibal A, Genolla J, Rubio D, Del Campo J, Bodi R . Circulating CA 15-3 levels in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients and in non-malignant diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1989; 13(2):123-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF01806524. View