» Articles » PMID: 11572019

Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2001 Sep 27
PMID 11572019
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a noninvasive imaging technique capable of identifying primary tumors and metastases with high sensitivity and accuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body FDG-PET imaging for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer after surgery. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging was performed on 27 patients with suspected recurrent breast carcinoma. PET images were evaluated qualitatively for each patient and lesion. FDG-PET scans showed that there were 61 reference sites of malignant or benign lesions in 27 patients. In a patient-based analysis, FDG-PET scans correctly identified 16 of 17 patients with recurrent or metastatic disease and 8 of 10 without recurrence, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 94%, 80%, and 89%, respectively. In a lesion-based analysis, FDG-PET scans correctly identified 46 of 48 lesion sites with recurrent or metastatic disease and 11 of 13 without recurrence. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for all lesion sites were 96%, 85%, and 93%, respectively. FDG-PET scans revealed unsuspected recurrent or metastatic diseases in 8 of 27 (30%) of patients and 11 of 20 (55%) distant metastatic lesions. In 13 patients treatment was altered by the outcome of the PET scan. We concluded that whole-body FDG-PET scan is a useful diagnostic imaging modality for detecting recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma in patients suspected of having recurrent disease after primary surgery.

Citing Articles

A Prospective Study Comparing the Role of 18 FDG PET-CT with Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Tc99m Bone Scan for Staging Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Bhoriwal S, Deo S, Kumar R, Thulkar S, Gogia A, Sharma D Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021; 12(2):266-271.

PMID: 34295069 PMC: 8272774. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01299-4.


Special Relevance of FDG-PET as an Upfront Diagnostic Modality at Initial Diagnosis and in Suspected Recurrence in Patients of Breast Carcinoma Hailing From Lower Socioeconomic Status Owing to Relative Late Presentation: A Pilot Study in a Medical....

Shetty S, Tayade M, Basu S Indian J Surg Oncol. 2014; 5(1):46-58.

PMID: 24669165 PMC: 3964235. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-014-0295-6.


¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake on PET CT and glucose transporter 1 expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Hong R, Lim S World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(2):168-74.

PMID: 22253523 PMC: 3257444. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i2.168.


Disease Restaging and Diagnosis of Recurrent and Metastatic Disease Following Primary Therapy with FDG-PET Imaging.

Eubank W, Lee J, Mankoff D PET Clin. 2010; 4(3):299-312.

PMID: 20161481 PMC: 2794199. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2009.09.001.


FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.

Pan L, Han Y, Sun X, Liu J, Gang H J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010; 136(7):1007-22.

PMID: 20091186 PMC: 2874488. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0746-6.


References
1.
Avril N, Dose J, Janicke F, Ziegler S, Romer W, Weber W . Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88(17):1204-9. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.17.1204. View

2.
Flanagan F, Dehdashti F, Siegel B . PET in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 1998; 28(4):290-302. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(98)80034-2. View

3.
Smith I, Ogston K, Whitford P, Smith F, Sharp P, Norton M . Staging of the axilla in breast cancer: accurate in vivo assessment using positron emission tomography with 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Ann Surg. 1998; 228(2):220-7. PMC: 1191464. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199808000-00012. View

4.
Noh D, Yun I, Kim J, Kang H, Lee D, Chung J . Diagnostic value of positron emission tomography for detecting breast cancer. World J Surg. 1998; 22(3):223-7; discussion 227-8. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900374. View

5.
Scheidhauer K, Scharl A, Pietrzyk U, Wagner R, Gohring U, Schomacker K . Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996; 23(6):618-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00834522. View