» Articles » PMID: 37648223

Development and Validation of SafeHIT: An Instrument to Assess the Self-Reported Safe Use of Health Information Technology

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2023 Aug 30
PMID 37648223
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Implementing health information technology (HIT) may cause unintended consequences and safety risks when incorrectly designed and used. Yet, the tools to assess self-reported safe use of HIT are not well established.

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate SafeHIT, an instrument to assess self-reported safe use of HIT among health care practitioners.

Methods: Systematic literature review and a semistructured interview with 31 experts were adopted to generate SafeHIT instrument items. In total, 450 physicians from various departments at three Malaysian public hospitals participated in the questionnaire survey to validate SafeHIT. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were undertaken to explore the items that best represent a specific construct and to confirm the reliability and validity of the SafeHIT, respectively.

Results: The final SafeHIT consisted of 14 constructs and 58 items in total. The result of the CFA confirmed that all constructs demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity.

Conclusion: A reliable and valid theoretically underpinned measure of determinants of safe HIT use behavior has been developed. Understanding external factors that influence safe HIT use is useful for developing targeted interventions that favor the quality and safety of health care.

References
1.
Manser T . Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 53(2):143-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x. View

2.
Westbrook J, Baysari M, Li L, Burke R, Richardson K, Day R . The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(6):1159-67. PMC: 3822121. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001745. View

3.
Feldman S, Buchalter S, Hayes L . Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2018; 6(2):e10264. PMC: 6006013. DOI: 10.2196/10264. View

4.
Hoonakker P, Cartmill R, Carayon P, Walker J . Development and Psychometric Qualities of the SEIPS Survey to Evaluate CPOE/EHR Implementation in ICUs. Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform. 2011; 6(1):51-69. PMC: 3070305. DOI: 10.4018/jhisi.2011010104. View

5.
Kinlay M, Zheng W, Burke R, Juraskova I, Moles R, Baysari M . Medication errors related to computerized provider order entry systems in hospitals and how they change over time: A narrative review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020; 17(9):1546-1552. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.004. View