» Articles » PMID: 15042263

Interactions Between Eye Movement Systems in Cats and Humans

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2004 Mar 26
PMID 15042263
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eye movements can be broadly classified into target-selecting and gaze-stabilizing eye movements. How do the different systems interact under natural conditions? Here we investigate interactions between the optokinetic and the target-selecting system in cats and humans. We use combinations of natural and grating stimuli. The natural stimuli are movies and pictures taken from the cat's own point of view with a head-mounted camera while it moved about freely in an outdoor environment. We superimpose linear global motion on the stimuli and use measurements of optokinetic nystagmus as a probe to study the interaction between the different systems responsible for controlling eye movements. Cats display higher precision stabilizing eye movements in response to natural pictures as compared to drifting gratings. In contrast, humans perform similarly under these two conditions. This suggests an interaction of the optokinetic and the pursuit system. In cats, the natural movies elicit very weak optokinetic responses. In humans, by contrast, the natural movie stimuli elicit effectively stabilizing eye movements. In both species, we find a unimodal distribution of saccades for all stimulus velocities. This suggests an early interaction of target-selecting and gaze-stabilizing saccades. Thus, we argue for a more integrated view in humans of the different eye movement systems.

Citing Articles

The marmoset monkey as a model for visual neuroscience.

Mitchell J, Leopold D Neurosci Res. 2015; 93:20-46.

PMID: 25683292 PMC: 4408257. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.01.008.


Saccadic compensation for reflexive optokinetic nystagmus just as good as compensation for volitional pursuit.

Harrison J, Freeman T, Sumner P J Vis. 2015; 15(1):15.1.24.

PMID: 25624463 PMC: 4306346. DOI: 10.1167/15.1.24.


Primary visual cortex represents the difference between past and present.

Nortmann N, Rekauzke S, Onat S, Konig P, Jancke D Cereb Cortex. 2013; 25(6):1427-40.

PMID: 24343889 PMC: 4428292. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht318.


Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Tatler B, Hayhoe M, Land M, Ballard D J Vis. 2011; 11(5):5.

PMID: 21622729 PMC: 3134223. DOI: 10.1167/11.5.5.


The sparseness of neuronal responses in ferret primary visual cortex.

Tolhurst D, Smyth D, Thompson I J Neurosci. 2009; 29(8):2355-70.

PMID: 19244512 PMC: 6666250. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3869-08.2009.


References
1.
Bahill A, Stark L . Overlapping saccades and glissades are produced by fatigue in the saccadic eye movement system. Exp Neurol. 1975; 48(1):95-106. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(75)90225-3. View

2.
Crommelinck M, Roucoux A . Characteristics of cat's eye saccades in different states of alertness. Brain Res. 1976; 103(3):574-8. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90458-3. View

3.
Missal M, Lefevre P, Crommelinck M, Roucoux A . Evidence for high-velocity smooth pursuit in the trained cat. Exp Brain Res. 1995; 106(3):509-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00231076. View

4.
Guitton D, Munoz D, Galiana H . Gaze control in the cat: studies and modeling of the coupling between orienting eye and head movements in different behavioral tasks. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 64(2):509-31. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.2.509. View

5.
Leopold D, Plettenberg H, Logothetis N . Visual processing in the ketamine-anesthetized monkey. Optokinetic and blood oxygenation level-dependent responses. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 143(3):359-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0998-0. View