» Articles » PMID: 24343889

Primary Visual Cortex Represents the Difference Between Past and Present

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Dec 18
PMID 24343889
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The visual system is confronted with rapidly changing stimuli in everyday life. It is not well understood how information in such a stream of input is updated within the brain. We performed voltage-sensitive dye imaging across the primary visual cortex (V1) to capture responses to sequences of natural scene contours. We presented vertically and horizontally filtered natural images, and their superpositions, at 10 or 33 Hz. At low frequency, the encoding was found to represent not the currently presented images, but differences in orientation between consecutive images. This was in sharp contrast to more rapid sequences for which we found an ongoing representation of current input, consistent with earlier studies. Our finding that for slower image sequences, V1 does no longer report actual features but represents their relative difference in time counteracts the view that the first cortical processing stage must always transfer complete information. Instead, we show its capacities for change detection with a new emphasis on the role of automatic computation evolving in the 100-ms range, inevitably affecting information transmission further downstream.

Citing Articles

Response retention and apparent motion effect in visual cortex models.

Tiselko V, Volgushev M, Jancke D, Chizhov A PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293725.

PMID: 37917779 PMC: 10621977. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293725.


Perception of the difference between past and present stimulus: A rare orientation illusion may indicate incidental access to prediction error-like signals.

Staadt R, Philipp S, Cremers J, Kornmeier J, Jancke D PLoS One. 2020; 15(5):e0232349.

PMID: 32365070 PMC: 7197803. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232349.


The Flash-Lag, Fröhlich and Related Motion Illusions Are Natural Consequences of Discrete Sampling in the Visual System.

Schneider K Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1227.

PMID: 30131732 PMC: 6090144. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01227.


TMS-induced neuronal plasticity enables targeted remodeling of visual cortical maps.

Kozyrev V, Staadt R, Eysel U, Jancke D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(25):6476-6481.

PMID: 29866856 PMC: 6016806. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802798115.


Flexible weighting of diverse inputs makes hippocampal function malleable.

Aly M, Turk-Browne N Neurosci Lett. 2017; 680:13-22.

PMID: 28587901 PMC: 5712489. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.063.


References
1.
Felsen G, Shen Y, Yao H, Spor G, Li C, Dan Y . Dynamic modification of cortical orientation tuning mediated by recurrent connections. Neuron. 2002; 36(5):945-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01011-5. View

2.
Rucci M, Iovin R, Poletti M, Santini F . Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail. Nature. 2007; 447(7146):851-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature05866. View

3.
Omer D, Hildesheim R, Grinvald A . Temporally-structured acquisition of multidimensional optical imaging data facilitates visualization of elusive cortical representations in the behaving monkey. Neuroimage. 2013; 82:237-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.045. View

4.
Adesnik H, Scanziani M . Lateral competition for cortical space by layer-specific horizontal circuits. Nature. 2010; 464(7292):1155-60. PMC: 2908490. DOI: 10.1038/nature08935. View

5.
Eriksson D, Wunderle T, Schmidt K . Visual cortex combines a stimulus and an error-like signal with a proportion that is dependent on time, space, and stimulus contrast. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012; 6:26. PMC: 3336196. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00026. View