» Articles » PMID: 1482151

Comparison of Two Antibiotic Regimens (piperacillin Plus Amikacin Versus Ceftazidime Plus Amikacin) As Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Cancer

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1992 Dec 1
PMID 1482151
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A total of 170 febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer were randomly assigned to be treated with piperacillin-amikacin or ceftazidime-amikacin. The overall response rates were similar in both groups (68 and 65%, respectively). Response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 54.5% for piperacillin-amikacin and 58.8% for ceftazidime-amikacin. Response rates for gram-negative bacillary infections were 65 and 73%, respectively. There was also no difference for gram-positive infections (31 and 50%, respectively). The toxicities were also comparable and consisted of skin rashes, hypokalemia, and diarrhea. Vancomycin was added if the fever persisted 72 h after the beginning of therapy; it increased the response rates to 94% when used with piperacillin-amikacin and 92% when used with ceftazidime plus amikacin. Our results suggest that the combinations show similar global efficacies in the treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Piperacillin-tazobactum plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin as empirical therapy for Fever in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.

Ghalaut P, Chaudhary U, Ghalaut V, Dhingra A, Dixit G, Aggarwal S Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012; 27(3):131-5.

PMID: 22942562 PMC: 3155712. DOI: 10.1007/s12288-011-0076-0.


Infectious complications in patients with hematological malignancies consulted by the Infectious Diseases team: a retrospective cohort study (1997-2001).

Guven G, Uzun O, Cakir B, Akova M, Unal S Support Care Cancer. 2005; 14(1):52-5.

PMID: 15947955 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0836-1.


Piperacillin-tazobactam and netilmicin as a safe and efficacious empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic children.

Le Guyader N, Auvrignon A, Vu-Thien H, Portier E, Tabone M, Leverger G Support Care Cancer. 2004; 12(10):720-4.

PMID: 15138864 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0641-2.


[Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].

Harten P, Seyfarth B, Schmitz N Med Klin (Munich). 1998; 93(10):598-611.

PMID: 9849051 DOI: 10.1007/BF03042675.


Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Rains C, Bryson H, Peters D Drugs. 1995; 49(4):577-617.

PMID: 7789291 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00008.

References
1.
Casali A, Ameglio F, Gionfra T, Tonachella R, Paoletti G, Gallo Curcio C . Amikacin plus ceftazidime versus amikacin plus piperacillin versus amikacin plus aztreonam in infections in neoplastic patients with granulocytopenia. Chemioterapia. 1987; 6(6):440-4. View

2.
Winston D, Murphy W, Young L, HEWITT W . Piperacillin therapy for serious bacterial infections. Am J Med. 1980; 69(2):255-61. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90386-1. View

3.
Bodey G, Alvarez M, Jones P, Rolston K, Steelhammer L, Fainstein V . Imipenem-cilastatin as initial therapy for febrile cancer patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 30(2):211-4. PMC: 180520. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.30.2.211. View

4.
Yost R, Ramphal R . Ceftazidime review. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1985; 19(7-8):509-13. DOI: 10.1177/106002808501900701. View

5.
Meunier F, Zinner S, Gaya H, Calandra T, Viscoli C, Klastersky J . Prospective randomized evaluation of ciprofloxacin versus piperacillin plus amikacin for empiric antibiotic therapy of febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients with lymphomas and solid tumors. The European Organization for Research on Treatment of.... Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991; 35(5):873-8. PMC: 245122. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.35.5.873. View