Comparison of Two Antibiotic Regimens (piperacillin Plus Amikacin Versus Ceftazidime Plus Amikacin) As Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
A total of 170 febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer were randomly assigned to be treated with piperacillin-amikacin or ceftazidime-amikacin. The overall response rates were similar in both groups (68 and 65%, respectively). Response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 54.5% for piperacillin-amikacin and 58.8% for ceftazidime-amikacin. Response rates for gram-negative bacillary infections were 65 and 73%, respectively. There was also no difference for gram-positive infections (31 and 50%, respectively). The toxicities were also comparable and consisted of skin rashes, hypokalemia, and diarrhea. Vancomycin was added if the fever persisted 72 h after the beginning of therapy; it increased the response rates to 94% when used with piperacillin-amikacin and 92% when used with ceftazidime plus amikacin. Our results suggest that the combinations show similar global efficacies in the treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients.
Ghalaut P, Chaudhary U, Ghalaut V, Dhingra A, Dixit G, Aggarwal S Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012; 27(3):131-5.
PMID: 22942562 PMC: 3155712. DOI: 10.1007/s12288-011-0076-0.
Guven G, Uzun O, Cakir B, Akova M, Unal S Support Care Cancer. 2005; 14(1):52-5.
PMID: 15947955 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0836-1.
Le Guyader N, Auvrignon A, Vu-Thien H, Portier E, Tabone M, Leverger G Support Care Cancer. 2004; 12(10):720-4.
PMID: 15138864 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0641-2.
[Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].
Harten P, Seyfarth B, Schmitz N Med Klin (Munich). 1998; 93(10):598-611.
PMID: 9849051 DOI: 10.1007/BF03042675.
Rains C, Bryson H, Peters D Drugs. 1995; 49(4):577-617.
PMID: 7789291 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00008.