» Articles » PMID: 14734735

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is a Determinant of Responsiveness to B Cell Antigen Receptor-mediated Epstein-Barr Virus Activation

Overview
Journal J Immunol
Date 2004 Jan 22
PMID 14734735
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

B cell Ag receptor (BCR) cross-linking with anti-Ig Abs efficiently induces activation of latently infected EBV in some B cell lines, but not in others. The present study was aimed at defining the molecular mechanisms that determine the response to BCR-mediated EBV activation. Comparison of Burkitt's lymphoma-derived Akata, Mutu-I, and Daudi cells, which are representative responders and nonresponders to BCR-mediated EBV activation, respectively, indicated that three signaling pathways, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), were activated in anti-Ig-treated Akata and Mutu-I cells. However, in anti-Ig-treated Daudi cells PI3K was not activated, ERK was faintly activated, and p38 MAPK was constitutively phosphorylated irrespective of anti-Ig treatment. Restoration of PI3K activity with insulin-like growth factor 1 restored ERK and p38 MAPK pathways, and was accompanied by EBV activation in anti-Ig-treated Daudi cells. In contrast, a specific inhibitor for PI3K, wortmannin, inhibited EBV activation by anti-Ig Abs in Akata and Mutu-I cells. Transfection assays in EBV-negative Daudi cells revealed that PI3K activated a promoter for BZLF1, which is a switch of EBV activation from a latent infection, in the absence of other EBV products suggesting that the BZLF promoter was a target of BCR signaling, and that PI3K was important for BCR-mediated BZLF1 activation. These results indicate that the absence of PI3K impedes the progression of signals through the BCR and becomes a determinant of unresponsiveness to BCR-mediated EBV activation.

Citing Articles

MicroRNA-focused CRISPR/Cas9 screen identifies miR-142 as a key regulator of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation.

Chen Y, Kincaid R, Bastin K, Fachko D, Skalsky R PLoS Pathog. 2024; 20(6):e1011970.

PMID: 38885264 PMC: 11213311. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011970.


Epstein-Barr Virus and Human Herpesvirus-6 Reactivation in Acute COVID-19 Patients.

Brooks B, Tancredi C, Song Y, Mogus A, Huang M, Zhu H Viruses. 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 36146679 PMC: 9504756. DOI: 10.3390/v14091872.


iTRAQ-Based Proteomics Analysis of Human Cytomegalovirus Latency and Reactivation in T98G Cells.

Cheng S, Zhao F, Wen L, Yang B, Wang X, Huang S J Virol. 2021; 96(2):e0147621.

PMID: 34730396 PMC: 8791298. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01476-21.


Stress-Induced Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation.

Sausen D, Bhutta M, Gallo E, Dahari H, Borenstein R Biomolecules. 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34572593 PMC: 8470332. DOI: 10.3390/biom11091380.


Studies and Clinical Observations Imply a Synergistic Effect Between Epstein-Barr Virus and Dengue Virus Infection.

Deng X, Zhao L, Liang X, Li D, Yu L, Zhang F Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:691008.

PMID: 34220783 PMC: 8249608. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.691008.