» Articles » PMID: 1467040

Transoesophageal Doppler Echocardiographic Measurement of Cardiac Output by the Mitral Annulus Method

Overview
Journal Br Heart J
Date 1992 Nov 1
PMID 1467040
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare cardiac output measured by the transoesophageal Doppler and thermodilution techniques.

Design: Prospective direct comparison of paired measurements by both techniques in each patient.

Setting: Intensive care unit in a cardiovascular centre.

Patients: 65 patients after open heart surgery (mean (SD) age 53 (12) years).

Interventions: Cardiac output was measured simultaneously by the transoesophageal Doppler and thermodilution techniques. Cardiac output was measured again after a mechanical intervention or volume loading.

Results: The limits of agreement were -2.53 to +0.83 1.min-1 for cardiac output measured by the Doppler and thermodilution techniques. This suggests that the Doppler method alone would not be suitable for clinical use. The second measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution was compared with cardiac output estimated from the first and second Doppler measurements and the first thermodilution measurement. The limits of agreement (-0.55 to +0.51 1.min-1) were good enough for clinical use.

Conclusions: After cardiac output had been measured simultaneously by both the Doppler and thermodilution techniques, subsequent transoesophageal Doppler alone gave a clinically useful measurement of cardiac output.

Citing Articles

Two-dimensional transthoracic measure of mitral annulus in mitral valve prolapse and moderate to severe regurgitation: a method comparison analysis with three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Berthelot-Richer M, Vakulenko H, Calleja A, Woo A, Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 32(1):2.

PMID: 38907302 PMC: 11177645. DOI: 10.1186/s44348-024-00001-w.


Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Wang Y, Shi J, Hua Z, Xu J PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0222105.

PMID: 31581196 PMC: 6776392. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222105.


Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable.

Wetterslev M, Moller-Sorensen H, Johansen R, Perner A Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42(8):1223-33.

PMID: 26932349 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4258-y.


Cardiac output monitoring by echocardiography: should we pass on Swan-Ganz catheters?.

Perrino Jr A Yale J Biol Med. 1993; 66(5):397-413.

PMID: 7825341 PMC: 2588877.

References
1.
Fischer A, Benis A, JURADO R, Seely E, Teirstein P, Litwak R . Analysis of errors in measurement of cardiac output by simultaneous dye and thermal dilution in cardiothoracic surgical patients. Cardiovasc Res. 1978; 12(3):190-9. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/12.3.190. View

2.
SELLERS R, Levy M, AMPLATZ K, Lillehei C . LEFT RETROGRADE CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY IN ACQUIRED CARDIAC DISEASE: TECHNIC, INDICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS IN 700 CASES. Am J Cardiol. 1964; 14:437-47. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(64)90027-x. View

3.
Goldberg S, Dickinson D, Wilson N . Evaluation of an elliptical area technique for calculating mitral blood flow by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1985; 54(1):68-75. PMC: 481851. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.54.1.68. View

4.
Horowitz S, MESEL E, Sahn D, Fisher D, Larson D . A pulsed Doppler echocardiographic method for calculating pulmonary and systemic blood flow in atrial level shunts: validation studies in animals and initial human experience. Circulation. 1984; 69(1):80-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.69.1.80. View

5.
Huntsman L, STEWART D, Barnes S, Franklin S, Colocousis J, Hessel E . Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation. 1983; 67(3):593-602. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.67.3.593. View