» Articles » PMID: 14645263

The Growth Advantage in Stationary-phase Phenotype Conferred by RpoS Mutations is Dependent on the PH and Nutrient Environment

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2003 Dec 4
PMID 14645263
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Escherichia coli cells that are aged in batch culture display an increased fitness referred to as the growth advantage in stationary phase, or GASP, phenotype. A common early adaptation to this culture environment is a mutant rpoS allele, such as rpoS819, that results in attenuated RpoS activity. However, it is important to note that during long-term batch culture, environmental conditions are in flux. To date, most studies of the GASP phenotype have focused on identifying alleles that render an advantage in a specific environment, Luria-Bertani broth (LB) batch culture. To determine what role environmental conditions play in rendering relative fitness advantages to E. coli cells carrying either the wild-type or rpoS819 alleles, we performed competitions under a variety of culture conditions in which either the available nutrients, the pH, or both were manipulated. In LB medium, we found that while the rpoS819 allele confers a strong competitive fitness advantage at basic pH, it confers a reduced advantage under neutral conditions, and it is disadvantageous under acidic conditions. Similar results were found using other media. rpoS819 conferred its greatest advantage in basic minimal medium in which either glucose or Casamino Acids were the sole source of carbon and energy. In acidic medium supplemented with either Casamino Acids or glucose, the wild-type allele conferred a slight advantage. In addition, populations were dynamic under all pH conditions tested, with neither the wild-type nor mutant rpoS alleles sweeping a culture. We also found that the strength of the fitness advantage gained during a 10-day incubation is pH dependent.

Citing Articles

Composition and liquid-to-solid maturation of protein aggregates contribute to bacterial dormancy development and recovery.

Bollen C, Louwagie S, Deroover F, Duverger W, Khodaparast L, Khodaparast L Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1046.

PMID: 39865082 PMC: 11770139. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56387-8.


The Mla pathway promotes re-expansion from stationary phase.

Leitner D, Zingl F, Morano A, Zhang H, Waldor M mBio. 2024; 16(2):e0343324.

PMID: 39714184 PMC: 11796348. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03433-24.


Evolution of pH-sensitive transcription termination in during adaptation to repeated long-term starvation.

Worthan S, McCarthy R, Delaleau M, Stikeleather R, Bratton B, Boudvillain M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(39):e2405546121.

PMID: 39298488 PMC: 11441560. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2405546121.


Pseudomonas putida Dynamics of Adaptation under Prolonged Resource Exhaustion.

Gross J, Katz S, Hershberg R Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38849986 PMC: 11179108. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae117.


Nonlethal deleterious mutation-induced stress accelerates bacterial aging.

Kohram M, Sanderson A, Loui A, Thompson P, Vashistha H, Shomar A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(20):e2316271121.

PMID: 38709929 PMC: 11098108. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2316271121.


References
1.
ROBEY M, Benito A, Hutson R, Pascual C, Park S, Mackey B . Variation in resistance to high hydrostatic pressure and rpoS heterogeneity in natural isolates of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001; 67(10):4901-7. PMC: 93247. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4901-4907.2001. View

2.
Finkel S, Kolter R . DNA as a nutrient: novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183(21):6288-93. PMC: 100116. DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001. View

3.
Hersh B, Farooq F, Barstad D, Blankenhorn D, Slonczewski J . A glutamate-dependent acid resistance gene in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178(13):3978-81. PMC: 232665. DOI: 10.1128/jb.178.13.3978-3981.1996. View

4.
Lin J, Lee I, Frey J, Slonczewski J, FOSTER J . Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995; 177(14):4097-104. PMC: 177142. DOI: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4097-4104.1995. View

5.
Penfound T, Smith D, Elliott J, FOSTER J . Control of acid resistance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1999; 181(11):3525-35. PMC: 93821. DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.11.3525-3535.1999. View