» Articles » PMID: 1454340

Comparison of Depth of Focus and Low-contrast Acuities for Monofocal Versus Multifocal Intraocular Lens Patients at 1 Year

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 1992 Nov 11
PMID 1454340
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Multifocal lenses have been shown to produce enhanced near and intermediate vision. The division of incoming light into more than one focal point must physically produce retinal images of reduced contrast. The purpose of this report is to provide quantitative data on the increased depth of focus and decreased contrast sensitivity demonstrated in patients receiving the 3M diffractive multifocal lens versus the parent monofocal control lens.

Methods: Uncorrected and best-corrected distance and near acuities, Regan and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity measurements, and defocus curves were obtained on 22 eyes with monofocal and 16 eyes with multifocal age-matched, pathology-free implants at 1 year after surgery.

Findings: Visual acuity data demonstrated significantly improved (P < 0.001) near acuities in multifocal patients with manifest refraction in place. No difference was noted between implants for other acuity measures. A statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) in contrast sensitivity was measured for multifocal implants at the limits of contrast and resolution (Regan 4%); however, careful patient questioning revealed no clinical impact. Defocus curves demonstrated significantly increased (P < 0.0001) depth of focus at the 20/40 acuity level of 3.8 diopters (D) in multifocal patients versus 1.8 D in monofocal patients.

Conclusion: The quantifiable and expected loss of contrast sensitivity in the examining lane, not manifest in patient awareness, appears to be an acceptable tradeoff for enhanced near/intermediate vision and depth of focus.

Citing Articles

Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS.

Palomino-Bautista C, Sanchez-Jean R, Carmona-Gonzalez D, Pinero D, Molina-Martin A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12081.

PMID: 34103624 PMC: 8187633. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91654-w.


Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Palomino-Bautista C, Sanchez-Jean R, Carmona-Gonzalez D, Pinero D, Molina-Martin A Int Ophthalmol. 2019; 40(2):351-359.

PMID: 31583551 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01186-6.


The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Barisic A, Patel S, Gabric N, Feinbaum C Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 255(2):367-373.

PMID: 28013392 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3566-9.


Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Ale J, Manns F, Ho A Optom Vis Sci. 2011; 88(7):789-94.

PMID: 21516047 PMC: 3125438. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318219c155.


All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Hayashi K, Masumoto M, Hayashi H Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009; 53(2):100-106.

PMID: 19333692 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-008-0626-7.