» Articles » PMID: 14513302

Modulation of Elbow Joint Stiffness in a Vertical Plane During Cyclic Movement at Lower or Higher Frequencies Than Natural Frequency

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Sep 27
PMID 14513302
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine how joint stiffness during cyclic movement in a vertical plane is modulated at lower or higher frequencies than the natural frequency of the system. Five male subjects were instructed to swing their forearms rhythmically in a vertical plane under various frequency conditions (0.7-2.25 Hz). To estimate the mechanical properties of the elbow joint, external perturbations were applied by an electromagnetic torque motor system to the forearm of each subject during the movement. Joint stiffness showed a significant quadratic trend with a minimum close to the natural frequency of the apparatus-forearm system (1.09+/-0.08 Hz). The resonant frequency showed the similar tendencies to joint stiffness and was significantly different from movement frequency in the lower frequency range (0.7-0.9 Hz). In addition, the ratio of joint stiffness to the background torque (ST(ratio)) was greater in the frequency conditions below the natural frequency than in the frequency conditions above the natural frequency and was relatively constant in the latter. These results suggested that: (1) the modulation of joint stiffness for movement in a vertical plane, by which the resonant frequency of the system is kept close to the movement frequency, may be limited to the movement frequency range above the natural frequency; and (2), in the case of movement in a vertical plane, the mechanism by which joint stiffness is modulated may change according to the relation between natural frequency and movement frequency.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Passive Upper Limb Stiffness and Its Function in Post-Stroke Individuals Wearing an Inertial Sensor during the Pendulum Test.

de Lima M, Dos Santos Couto Paz C, Ribeiro T, Fachin-Martins E Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050547 PMC: 10099160. DOI: 10.3390/s23073487.


Time flies when you are in a groove: using entrainment to mechanical resonance to teach a desired movement distorts the perception of the movement's timing.

Zondervan D, Duarte J, Rowe J, Reinkensmeyer D Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(3):1057-70.

PMID: 24398898 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3819-3.


Optimal workloop energetics of muscle-actuated systems: an impedance matching view.

Farahat W, Herr H PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(6):e1000795.

PMID: 20532203 PMC: 2880559. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000795.


Moving the arm at different rates: slow movements are avoided.

van der Wel R, Sternad D, Rosenbaum D J Mot Behav. 2009; 42(1):29-36.

PMID: 19906636 PMC: 3566270. DOI: 10.1080/00222890903267116.


Resonance tuning of a neuromechanical system with two negative sensory feedback configurations.

Williams C, DeWeerth S Neurocomputing (Amst). 2009; 70(10-12):1954-1959.

PMID: 19584947 PMC: 2705909. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.10.078.

References
1.
Feldman A . Superposition of motor programs--I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience. 1980; 5(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90073-1. View

2.
Milner T . Dependence of elbow viscoelastic behavior on speed and loading in voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res. 1993; 93(1):177-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00227793. View

3.
Lacquaniti F, Carrozzo M, Borghese N . Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 69(5):1443-64. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.5.1443. View

4.
Gomi H, Kawato M . Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement. Biol Cybern. 1997; 76(3):163-71. DOI: 10.1007/s004220050329. View

5.
Bennett D, Hollerbach J, Xu Y, Hunter I . Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 88(2):433-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF02259118. View