» Articles » PMID: 138207

Use of Marlex Mesh in Acute Loss of the Abdominal Wall Due to Infection

Overview
Date 1977 Feb 1
PMID 138207
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Closure of wounds of the abdomen with a minimal amount of foreign material is still the preferred method. However, in those instances in which loss of tissue is too great to effect closure or in which closure will place the suture line under tension, the use of a synthetic plastic mesh is an effective alternative. As described, the technique avoids the risks of further necrosis of the tissue, infection and dehiscence. In those instances of extensive loss of tissue, it is frequently the only practical method available to reconstruct the abdominal wall.

Citing Articles

Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh?.

Vant Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk P, Bonjer H, Steyerberg E, Jeekel J Hernia. 2007; 11(5):409-13.

PMID: 17551808 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-007-0240-5.


History of treatment of groin hernia.

Lau W World J Surg. 2002; 26(6):748-59.

PMID: 12053232 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6297-5.


Prosthetic repair of incisional hernia in kidney transplant patients. A technique with onlay polypropylene mesh.

Birolini C, Mazzucchi E, Utiyama E, Nahas W, Rodrigues Jr A, Arap S Hernia. 2001; 5(1):31-5.

PMID: 11387720 DOI: 10.1007/BF01576162.


Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh: short-term benefits versus long-term complications.

Voyles C, Richardson J, Bland K, Tobin G, Flint L, Polk Jr H Ann Surg. 1981; 194(2):219-23.

PMID: 6455099 PMC: 1345243. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198108000-00017.


Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection.

Brown G, Richardson J, Malangoni M, Tobin G, Ackerman D, Polk Jr H Ann Surg. 1985; 201(6):705-11.

PMID: 3159353 PMC: 1250799. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198506000-00006.