» Articles » PMID: 13680236

The Fracture Gap Size Influences the Local Vascularization and Tissue Differentiation in Callus Healing

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2003 Sep 19
PMID 13680236
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Revascularization of a fracture depends on fracture stability and fracture gap conditions. The aim of the study was to determine quantitatively the revascularization and tissue differentiation in an animal model with different fracture gaps and controlled biomechanical conditions.

Materials And Method: The study was performed on ten sheep with an osteotomy on the right metatarsal. The fracture was stabilized by an external fixator that allowed adjustable axial interfragmentary movement. Two groups of five sheep each were adjusted to a medium sized gap (M, 2.1 mm) and a large gap (L, 5.7 mm) under comparable interfragmentary strain (30-32%). The animals were killed after 9 weeks, and the metatarsals were prepared for undecalcified histology and analysis of tissue differentiation and vessel distribution.

Results: Group M showed significantly more revascularization (M=1.62, L=0.85 vessels/mm2), more bone formation (M=37.2%, L=13.9%) and less fibrocartilage tissue (M=18.1%, L=39.1%) than group L. Larger vessels (>40 microm) were found mainly in the medullary channel, and smaller vessels (<20 microm) mainly in the peripheral callus. Histologically, group M showed partial bony bridging of the osteotomy gap, and the group L had delayed healing.

Conclusion: A good reduction of a fracture with small interfragmentary gaps is important for its revascularization and healing.

Citing Articles

Mechanically compliant locking plates for diaphyseal fracture fixation: A biomechanical study.

Huxman C, Lewis G, Armstrong A, Updegrove G, Koroneos Z, Butler J J Orthop Res. 2024; 43(1):217-227.

PMID: 39279031 PMC: 11615426. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25968.


Unilateral external fixator and its biomechanical effects in treating different types of femoral fracture: A finite element study with experimental validated model.

Abd Aziz A, Ammarullah M, Ng B, Gan H, Rafiq Abdul Kadir M, Ramlee M Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e26660.

PMID: 38404809 PMC: 10884926. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26660.


Additively manufactured porous scaffolds by design for treatment of bone defects.

Toosi S, Javid-Naderi M, Tamayol A, Ebrahimzadeh M, Yaghoubian S, Mousavi Shaegh S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 11:1252636.

PMID: 38312510 PMC: 10834686. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1252636.


Employing direct electromagnetic coupling to assess acute fracture healing: An ovine model assessment.

Labus K, Wolynski J, Easley J, Stewart H, Ilic M, Notaros B Injury. 2023; 54(12):111080.

PMID: 37802738 PMC: 10843464. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111080.


Effect of fracture level on the residual fracture gap during tibial intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures.

Albayrak K, Misir A, Alpay Y, Buyuk A, Akpinar E, Gursu S SICOT J. 2023; 9:26.

PMID: 37565988 PMC: 10416760. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2023023.


References
1.
Muller J, Schenk R, WILLENEGGER H . [Experimental studies on the development of reactive pseudarthroses on the canine radius]. Helv Chir Acta. 1968; 35(1):301-8. View

2.
Carter D, Beaupre G, Giori N, Helms J . Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (355 Suppl):S41-55. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00006. View

3.
Carter D, Blenman P, Beaupre G . Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 1988; 6(5):736-48. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100060517. View

4.
Augat P, Margevicius K, Simon J, Wolf S, Suger G, Claes L . Local tissue properties in bone healing: influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap. J Orthop Res. 1998; 16(4):475-81. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160413. View

5.
Schweiberer L, Schenk R . [Histomorphology and vascularization of secondary healing of bone fractures with emphasis on tibial shaft fractures (author's transl)]. Unfallheilkunde. 1977; 80(7):275-86. View