» Articles » PMID: 12970035

Risk Assessment for Inpatient Survival in the Long-term Acute Care Setting After Prolonged Critical Illness

Overview
Journal Chest
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2003 Sep 13
PMID 12970035
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The past decade has witnessed growth in the long-term acute care (LTAC) hospital industry. There are no reliable risk assessment models that can adjust outcomes across such facilities with different criteria for admitting patients. Variation in reported outcomes makes it difficult to determine whether a patient, or group of patients, may benefit from such care. This study sought to determine the extent to which survival in the LTAC setting is associated with age, race, residual organ system failures (OSFs), or APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) III scores at the time of admission to LTAC.

Design: Retrospective medical record review.

Setting: Four freestanding facilities of a LTAC hospital.

Patients: A sample of 300 hospital admissions weighted to represent the study hospital population.

Measurements: Inpatient survival modeled as a function of age, APACHE III score calculated within 72 h prior to LTAC admission, and residual OSFs present on admission to LTAC.

Results: Logistic regression analysis shows age and OSF were most predictive of inpatient survival (receiver operating characteristic curve area = 0.81). APACHE III score was not predictive of survival in the multivariate model.

Conclusions: Survival in LTAC is primarily associated with age and OSFs, which should be used to adjust for patient populations among LTAC settings when comparing outcomes. Our model identifies a group of patients with the poorest likelihood of survival in the LTAC setting, and may be used to facilitate dialogue with patients and family in cases where continued aggressive care is least effective.

Citing Articles

External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria.

Dibiasi C, Kimberger O, Bologheanu R, Staudinger T, Heinz G, Zauner C BMJ Open. 2022; 12(9):e066197.

PMID: 36127078 PMC: 9490575. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066197.


Noninvasive ventilation during the weaning process in chronically critically ill patients.

Sancho J, Servera E, Jara-Palomares L, Barrot E, Sanchez-Oro-Gomez R, Gomez de Terreros F ERJ Open Res. 2017; 2(4).

PMID: 28053973 PMC: 5152849. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00061-2016.


Prognostic factors of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation in a medical intensive care unit of Korea.

Kim M, Cho W, Lee K, Kim K, Jeon D, Park H Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2012; 73(4):224-30.

PMID: 23166558 PMC: 3492423. DOI: 10.4046/trd.2012.73.4.224.


Chronic critical illness.

Nelson J, Cox C, Hope A, Carson S Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182(4):446-54.

PMID: 20448093 PMC: 2937238. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201002-0210CI.


A prognostic model for one-year mortality in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Carson S, Garrett J, Hanson L, Lanier J, Govert J, Brake M Crit Care Med. 2008; 36(7):2061-9.

PMID: 18552692 PMC: 2728216. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817b8925.