» Articles » PMID: 12930572

Ovarian Responses to Recombinant FSH or HMG in Normogonadotrophic Women Following Pituitary Desensitization by a Depot GnRH Agonist for Assisted Reproduction

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2003 Aug 22
PMID 12930572
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

At present, there is considerable debate about the utility of supplemental LH in assisted reproduction treatment. In order to explore this, the present authors used a depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol combined with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The response to either rhFSH (75 IU FSH/ampoule; group rhFSH, 25 patients) or HMG (75 IU FSH and 75 IU LH/ampoule; group HMG, 25 patients) was compared in normo-ovulatory women suppressed with a depot triptorelin injection and candidates for ICSI. A fixed regimen of 150 IU rhFSH or HMG was administered in the first 14 days of treatment. Treatment was monitored with transvaginal pelvic ultrasonographic scans and serum measurement of FSH, LH, oestradiol, androstenedione, testosterone, progesterone, inhibin A, inhibin B and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at 2-day intervals. Although oestradiol serum concentrations on the day of HCG injection were similar, both the duration of treatment and the per cycle gonadotrophin dose were lower in group HMG. In the initial 16 days of gonadotrophin treatment, the area under the curve (AUC) of LH, oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin B were higher in group HMG; no differences were seen for the remaining hormones measured, including the inhibin B:inhibin A ratio. The dynamics of ovarian follicle development during gonadotrophin treatment were similar in both study groups, but there were more leading follicles (>17 mm in diameter) on the day of HCG injection in the rhFSH group. The number of oocytes, mature oocytes and good quality zygotes and embryos obtained were significantly increased in the rhFSH group. It is concluded that in IVF patients undergoing pituitary desensitization with a depot agonist preparation, supplemental LH may be required in terms of treatment duration and gonadotrophin consumption. However, both oocyte, embryo yield and quality were significantly higher with the use of rhFSH.

Citing Articles

The therapeutic effects of rFSH versus uFSH/uHMG on ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu Y, Zhang Q, Sun K, Xiu Y, Wang X, Wang K Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 309(6):2529-2555.

PMID: 37470817 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07095-5.


Urinary Versus Recombinant Gonadotropins for Ovarian Stimulation in Women Undergoing Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Patki A, Bavishi H, Kumari C, Kamraj J, Venugopal M, Kunjimoideen K J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018; 11(2):119-124.

PMID: 30158806 PMC: 6094533. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_79_17.


Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation.

Levi Setti P, Alviggi C, Colombo G, Pisanelli C, Ripellino C, Longobardi S J Endocrinol Invest. 2014; 38(5):497-503.

PMID: 25480425 PMC: 4555088. DOI: 10.1007/s40618-014-0204-4.


A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technology.

Ezcurra D, Humaidan P Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014; 12:95.

PMID: 25280580 PMC: 4287577. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-95.


Results from adding recombinant LH for assisted reproductive technology treatment: A randomized control trial.

Razi M, Mohseni F, Firouzabadi R, Janati S, Yari N, Etebary S Iran J Reprod Med. 2014; 12(2):111-6.

PMID: 24799868 PMC: 4009563.