» Articles » PMID: 12898103

Loads Applied Tangential to a Fingertip During an Object Restraint Task Can Trigger Short-latency As Well As Long-latency EMG Responses in Hand Muscles

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Aug 5
PMID 12898103
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the digital nerves can cause short- and long-latency increases in electromyographic activity (EMG) of the hand muscles, but mechanical stimulation of primarily tactile afferents in the digits generally evokes only a long-latency increase in EMG. To examine whether such stimuli can elicit short-latency reflex responses, we recorded EMG over the first dorsal interosseous muscle when subjects (n=13) used the tip of the right index finger to restrain a horizontally oriented plate from moving when very brisk tangential forces were applied in the distal direction. The plate was subjected to ramp-and-hold pulling loads at two intensities (a 1-N load applied at 32 N/s or a 2-N load applied at 64 N/s) at times unpredictable to the subjects (mean interval 2 s; trial duration 500 ms). The contact surface of the manipulandum was covered with rayon--a slippery material. For each load, EMG was averaged for 128 consecutive trials with reference to the ramp onset. In all subjects, an automatic increase in grip force was triggered by the loads applied at 32 N/s; the mean onset latency of the EMG response was 59.8 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SE) ms. In seven subjects (54%) this long-latency response was preceded by a weak short-latency excitation at 34.6 +/- 2.9 ms. With the loads applied at 64 N/s, the long-latency response occurred slightly earlier (58.9 +/- 1.7 ms) and, with one exception, all subjects generated a short-latency EMG response (34.9 +/- 1.3 ms). Despite the higher background grip force that subjects adopted during the stronger loads (4.9 +/- 0.3 N vs 2.5 +/- 0.2 N), the incidence of slips was higher--the manipulandum escaped from the grasp in 37 +/- 5% of trials with the 64 N/s ramps, but in only 18 +/- 4% with the 32-N/s ramps. The deformation of the fingertip caused by the tangential load, rather than incipient or overt slips, triggered the short-latency responses because such responses occurred even when the finger pad was fixed to the manipulandum with double-sided adhesive tape so that no slips occurred.

Citing Articles

Fast grip force adaptation to friction relies on localized fingerpad strains.

Delhaye B, Schiltz F, Crevecoeur F, Thonnard J, Lefevre P Sci Adv. 2024; 10(3):eadh9344.

PMID: 38232162 PMC: 10793957. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh9344.


Testing silicone digit extensions as a way to suppress natural sensation to evaluate supplementary tactile feedback.

Engels L, Cappello L, Fischer A, Cipriani C PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0256753.

PMID: 34469470 PMC: 8410127. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256753.


Neurophysiology of slip sensation and grip reaction: insights for hand prosthesis control of slippage.

Zangrandi A, DAlonzo M, Cipriani C, Pino G J Neurophysiol. 2021; 126(2):477-492.

PMID: 34232750 PMC: 7613203. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00087.2021.


Effects of aging on rapid grip force responses during bimanual manipulation of an active object.

Hibino H, Gorniak S Exp Brain Res. 2020; 238(10):2161-2178.

PMID: 32661648 PMC: 10103105. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05865-0.


Multisensory components of rapid motor responses to fingertip loading.

Crevecoeur F, Barrea A, Libouton X, Thonnard J, Lefevre P J Neurophysiol. 2017; 118(1):331-343.

PMID: 28468992 PMC: 5498727. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00091.2017.


References
1.
Macefield V, Hager-Ross C, Johansson R . Control of grip force during restraint of an object held between finger and thumb: responses of cutaneous afferents from the digits. Exp Brain Res. 1996; 108(1):155-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF00242913. View

2.
Cole K, Abbs J . Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object. J Neurophysiol. 1988; 60(4):1513-22. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.4.1513. View

3.
Johansson R, Westling G . Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(1):72-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247523. View

4.
Johansson R, Riso R, Hager C, BACKSTROM L . Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 89(1):181-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229015. View

5.
Winstein C, Horak F, Fisher B . Influence of central set on anticipatory and triggered grip-force adjustments. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 130(3):298-308. DOI: 10.1007/s002219900248. View