» Articles » PMID: 12898090

Hitting Moving Targets: a Dissociation Between the Use of the Target's Speed and Direction of Motion

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Aug 5
PMID 12898090
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous work has indicated that people do not use their judgment of a target's speed to determine where to hit it. Instead, they use their judgment of the target's changing position and an expected speed (based on the speed of previous targets). In the present study we investigate whether people also ignore the target's apparent direction of motion, and use the target's changing position and an expected direction of motion instead. Subjects hit targets that moved in slightly different directions across a screen. Sometimes the targets disappeared after 150 ms, long before the subjects could reach the screen. This prevented subjects from using the target's changing position to adjust their movements, making it possible to evaluate whether subjects were relying on the perceived or an expected (average) direction to guide their movements. The background moved perpendicular to the average direction of motion in some trials. This influences the target's perceived direction of motion while leaving its perceived position unaffected. When the background was stationary, subjects hit disappearing targets along their trajectory, just as they hit ones that remained visible. Moving the background affected the direction in which subjects started to move their hand, in accordance with the illusory change in direction of target motion. If the target disappeared, this resulted in a hit that was systematically off the target's trajectory. If the target remained visible, subjects corrected their initial error. Presumably they did so on the basis of information about the target's changing position, because if the target disappeared they did not correct the error. We conclude that people do use the target's perceived direction of motion to determine where to hit it. Thus the perceived direction of motion is treated differently than the perceived speed. This suggests that the motion of an object is not broken down into speed components in different directions, but that speed and direction are perceived and used separately.

Citing Articles

When intercepting moving targets, mid-movement error corrections reflect distinct responses to visual and haptic perturbations.

Gonzalez Polanco P, Mrotek L, Nielson K, Beardsley S, Scheidt R Exp Brain Res. 2022; 241(1):231-247.

PMID: 36469052 PMC: 10440829. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06515-3.


Tracking and perceiving diverse motion signals: Directional biases in human smooth pursuit and perception.

Wu X, Spering M PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0275324.

PMID: 36174036 PMC: 9522262. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275324.


How similar are responses to background motion and target displacements?.

Crowe E, Vellekoop P, van Meteren C, Smeets J, Brenner E Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(10):2667-2676.

PMID: 35972522 PMC: 9510109. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06436-1.


Hand movements respond to any motion near the endpoint.

Crowe E, Smeets J, Brenner E Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(6):1820-1825.

PMID: 35338448 PMC: 9338106. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02471-w.


Moving Advertisements Systematically Affect Gaze Behavior and Performance in the Soccer Penalty Kick.

Paterson G, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh G Front Sports Act Living. 2020; 1:69.

PMID: 33344992 PMC: 7739765. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00069.


References
1.
Francis G, Kim H . Perceived motion in orientational afterimages: direction and speed. Vision Res. 2001; 41(2):161-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00242-x. View

2.
Ball K, Sekuler R . Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination. Vision Res. 1987; 27(6):953-65. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90011-3. View

3.
Hubbard T . Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 2(3):322-38. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210971. View

4.
Smeets J, Glover S, Brenner E . Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping. Spat Vis. 2003; 16(3-4):311-24. DOI: 10.1163/156856803322467554. View

5.
Loffler G, Orbach H . Anisotropy in judging the absolute direction of motion. Vision Res. 2001; 41(27):3677-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00209-7. View