» Articles » PMID: 24203714

Environmental Invariants in the Representation of Motion: Implied Dynamics and Representational Momentum, Gravity, Friction, and Centripetal Force

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24203714
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Memory for the final position of a moving target is often shifted or displaced from the true final position of that target. Early studies of this memory shift focused on parallels between the momentum of the target and the momentum of the representation of the target and called this displacementrepresentational momentum, but many factors other than momentum contribute to the memory shift. A consideration of the empirical literature on representational momentum and related types of displacement suggests there are at least four different types of factors influencing the direction and magnitude of such memory shifts: stimulus characteristics (e.g., target direction, target velocity), implied dynamics and environmental invariants (e.g., implied momentum, gravity, friction, centripetal force), memory averaging of target and nontarget context (e.g., biases toward previous target locations or nontarget context), and observers' expectations (both tacit and conscious) regarding future target motion and target/context interactions. Several theories purporting to account for representational momentum and related types of displacement are also considered.

Citing Articles

Grounded cognition and the representation of momentum: abstract concepts modulate mislocalization.

Friedrich J, Raab M, Voigt L Psychol Res. 2025; 89(1):51.

PMID: 39843879 PMC: 11754331. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02076-6.


Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding - the physical world in grounded cognition.

Friedrich J, Fischer M, Raab M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2558-2580.

PMID: 38806790 PMC: 11680661. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3.


A discrete component in visual working memory encoding.

Park H, Zhang W J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024; 50(5):464-478.

PMID: 38421795 PMC: 11850077. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001196.


Forward effects from action observation: the role of attentional focus.

Iani F, Limata T, Ras I, Bucciarelli M Psychol Res. 2023; 88(3):773-785.

PMID: 37884629 PMC: 10965640. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01888-8.


Need for (expected) speed: Exploring the indirect influence of trial type consistency on representational momentum.

Merz S, Spence C, Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(8):2637-2654.

PMID: 37821746 PMC: 10600037. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02796-0.


References
1.
Hubbard T . Representational momentum, centripetal force, and curvilinear impetus. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996; 22(4):1049-60. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.4.1049. View

2.
Freyd J . Dynamic mental representations. Psychol Rev. 1987; 94(4):427-38. View

3.
McCloskey M, Kohl D . Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983; 9(1):146-56. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.1.146. View

4.
Cooke N, Breedin S . Naive misconceptions of Cooke and Breedin's research: response to Ranney. Mem Cognit. 2011; 22(4):503-7. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200873. View

5.
Hubbard T . Cognitive representation of motion: evidence for friction and gravity analogues. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995; 21(1):241-54. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.1.241. View