» Articles » PMID: 12859457

Quantitative Measurement of Airborne Allergens from Dust Mites, Dogs, and Cats Using an Ion-charging Device

Overview
Date 2003 Jul 16
PMID 12859457
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that children raised with an animal(s) in the house have a decreased risk of becoming sensitized. However, it is not clear whether this phenomenon is related to airborne exposure.

Objective: To estimate airborne exposure to animal dander and dust mite allergens using a device that can sample large volumes of air silently.

Methods: The device, which uses an ion-charging technique to move air and to collect particles, was run at 1.7 m3/min for 24 h in 44 homes with and without animals. The allergen collected was measured by ELISA for Fel d 1, Can f 1, Der p 1, and Der f 1.

Results: Airborne Fel d 1 was present in all homes with a cat (n=27). The quantities measured, i.e. 0.5-20 microg in 24 h, represent 0.01-0.3 microg Fel d 1 inhaled/day at normal breathing rates (20 L/h). Values for houses without a cat were 0.01-0.05 microg inhaled/day. Airborne Fel d 1 correlated significantly with floor Fel d 1 (r=0.58, P<0.001). Results for Can f 1 were similar in houses with a dog, but this allergen was only detected airborne in two houses without a dog. Neither Der p 1 nor Der f 1 (i.e. <0.01 microg) was detected, which represents < or =1 ng inhaled/day during normal domestic activity. During disturbance airborne mite was detected with both the ion-charging device and a filter run in parallel. For cat and mite allergens there was a close correlation between the two techniques (r=0.84, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Exposure to cat or dog allergen airborne in homes with an animal can be up to 100 times higher than exposure to mite allergen. The results are in keeping with a model where immunological tolerance to animal dander allergens results from high exposure.

Citing Articles

Sensitization to Furry Animals in Patients with Suspected Allergic Disease in China: A Multicenter Study.

Zhu H, Huang Z, Liu T, An N, Gan H, Huang D J Asthma Allergy. 2022; 15:1701-1712.

PMID: 36452936 PMC: 9704004. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S390473.


Sampling Devices for Indoor Allergen Exposure: Pros and Cons.

Grant T, Rule A, Koehler K, Wood R, Matsui E Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019; 19(1):9.

PMID: 30747291 PMC: 10371220. DOI: 10.1007/s11882-019-0833-y.


CD45 exclusion- and cross-linking-based receptor signaling together broaden FcεRI reactivity.

Felce J, Sezgin E, Wane M, Brouwer H, Dustin M, Eggeling C Sci Signal. 2018; 11(561).

PMID: 30563863 PMC: 7612966. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aat0756.


Indoor Air Quality.

Seguel J, Merrill R, Seguel D, Campagna A Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018; 11(4):284-295.

PMID: 30202344 PMC: 6125109. DOI: 10.1177/1559827616653343.


Home Environmental Interventions for House Dust Mite.

Wilson J, Platts-Mills T J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018; 6(1):1-7.

PMID: 29310755 PMC: 6474366. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.10.003.