» Articles » PMID: 35282203

A Dynamical, Radically Embodied, and Ecological Theory of Rhythm Development

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Mar 14
PMID 35282203
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Musical rhythm abilities-the perception of and coordinated action to the rhythmic structure of music-undergo remarkable change over human development. In the current paper, we introduce a theoretical framework for modeling the development of musical rhythm. The framework, based on Neural Resonance Theory (NRT), explains rhythm development in terms of and , which are formalized using a general theory that includes non-linear resonance and Hebbian plasticity. First, we review the developmental literature on musical rhythm, highlighting several developmental processes related to rhythm perception and action. Next, we offer an exposition of Neural Resonance Theory and argue that elements of the theory are consistent with dynamical, radically embodied (i.e., non-representational) and ecological approaches to cognition and development. We then discuss how dynamical models, implemented as self-organizing networks of neural oscillations with Hebbian plasticity, predict key features of music development. We conclude by illustrating how the notions of dynamical embodiment, resonance, and attunement provide a conceptual language for characterizing musical rhythm development, and, when formalized in physiologically informed dynamical models, provide a theoretical framework for generating testable empirical predictions about musical rhythm development, such as the kinds of native and non-native rhythmic structures infants and children can learn, steady-state evoked potentials to native and non-native musical rhythms, and the effects of short-term (e.g., infant bouncing, infant music classes), long-term (e.g., perceptual narrowing to musical rhythm), and very-long term (e.g., music enculturation, musical training) learning on music perception-action.

Citing Articles

Auditory Rhythm Encoding during the Last Trimester of Human Gestation: From Tracking the Basic Beat to Tracking Hierarchical Nested Temporal Structures.

Saadatmehr B, Edalati M, Wallois F, Ghostine G, Kongolo G, Flaten E J Neurosci. 2024; 45(4.

PMID: 39715688 PMC: 11756625. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0398-24.2024.


Exploring the dynamics of intentional sensorimotor desynchronization using phasing performance in music.

Kim J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1207646.

PMID: 38022969 PMC: 10653329. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1207646.


Dynamic models for musical rhythm perception and coordination.

Large E, Roman I, Kim J, Cannon J, Pazdera J, Trainor L Front Comput Neurosci. 2023; 17:1151895.

PMID: 37265781 PMC: 10229831. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1151895.


Why art? The role of arts in arts and health.

Vickhoff B Front Psychol. 2023; 14:765019.

PMID: 37034911 PMC: 10075207. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.765019.

References
1.
Drake C . Reproduction of musical rhythms by children, adult musicians, and adult nonmusicians. Percept Psychophys. 1993; 53(1):25-33. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211712. View

2.
Collier G, Wright C . Temporal rescaling of sample and complex rations in rhythmic tapping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(3):602-27. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.602. View

3.
Aslin R . Statistical learning: a powerful mechanism that operates by mere exposure. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016; 8(1-2). PMC: 5182173. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1373. View

4.
Granier-Deferre C, Ribeiro A, Jacquet A, Bassereau S . Near-term fetuses process temporal features of speech. Dev Sci. 2012; 14(2):336-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00978.x. View

5.
Doelling K, Poeppel D . Cortical entrainment to music and its modulation by expertise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(45):E6233-42. PMC: 4653203. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508431112. View