» Articles » PMID: 12807771

COM, a Heterochromatic Locus Governing the Control of Independent Endogenous Retroviruses from Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2003 Jun 17
PMID 12807771
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

ZAM and Idefix are two endogenous retroviruses whose expression is tightly controlled in Drosophila melanogaster. However, a line exists in which this control has been perturbed, resulting in a high mobilization rate for both retroviruses. This line is called the U (unstable) line as opposed to the other S (stable) lines. In the process of analyzing this control and tracing the genetic determinant involved, we found that ZAM and Idefix expression responded to two types of controls: one restricting their expression to specific somatic cells in the ovaries and the other silencing their expression in S lines but permitting it in U lines. While studying this second control in the U or S backgrounds, we found that the heterochromatic locus 20A2-3 on the X chromosome, previously implicated in the regulation of a third retroelement, gypsy, also controlled both ZAM and Idefix. We report here that genetic determinants necessary for endogenous retrovirus silencing occur at the 20A2-3 locus, which we call COM, for centre organisateur de mobilisation. We propose that if this point of control becomes mutated during the life of the fly, it may trigger processes reactivating dormant endogenous retroviruses and thus bring about sudden bursts of mobilization.

Citing Articles

Double trouble: two retrotransposons triggered a cascade of invasions in Drosophila species within the last 50 years.

Scarpa A, Pianezza R, Gellert H, Haider A, Kim B, Lai E Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):516.

PMID: 39788974 PMC: 11718211. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55779-6.


A comparative roadmap of PIWI-interacting RNAs across seven species reveals insights into de novo piRNA-precursor formation in mammals.

Konstantinidou P, Loubalova Z, Ahrend F, Friman A, Almeida M, Poulet A Cell Rep. 2024; 43(10):114777.

PMID: 39302833 PMC: 11615739. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114777.


Transposon and Transgene Tribulations in Mosquitoes: A Perspective of piRNA Proportions.

Lau N, Macias V DNA (Basel). 2024; 4(2):104-128.

PMID: 39076684 PMC: 11286205. DOI: 10.3390/dna4020006.


Reactivation of a somatic errantivirus and germline invasion in Drosophila ovaries.

Yoth M, Maupetit-Mehouas S, Akkouche A, Gueguen N, Bertin B, Jensen S Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6096.

PMID: 37773253 PMC: 10541861. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41733-5.


The Intricate Evolutionary Balance between Transposable Elements and Their Host: Who Will Kick at Goal and Convert the Next Try?.

Yoth M, Jensen S, Brasset E Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35625438 PMC: 9138309. DOI: 10.3390/biology11050710.


References
1.
Volpe T, Kidner C, Hall I, Teng G, Grewal S, Martienssen R . Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science. 2002; 297(5588):1833-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1074973. View

2.
Tcheressiz S, Calco V, Arnaud F, Arthaud L, Dastugue B, Vaury C . Expression of the Idefix retrotransposon in early follicle cells in the germarium of Drosophila melanogaster is determined by its LTR sequences and a specific genomic context. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002; 267(2):133-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-002-0641-1. View

3.
Lim J, Simmons M, Raymond J, Cox N, Doll R, Culbert T . Homologue destabilization by a putative transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983; 80(21):6624-7. PMC: 391222. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.80.21.6624. View

4.
Gatti M, Bonaccorsi S, Pimpinelli S . Looking at Drosophila mitotic chromosomes. Methods Cell Biol. 1994; 44:371-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60924-3. View

5.
Bucheton A . The relationship between the flamenco gene and gypsy in Drosophila: how to tame a retrovirus. Trends Genet. 1995; 11(9):349-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89105-2. View