» Articles » PMID: 35625438

The Intricate Evolutionary Balance Between Transposable Elements and Their Host: Who Will Kick at Goal and Convert the Next Try?

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35625438
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile DNA sequences that can jump from one genomic locus to another and that have colonized the genomes of all living organisms. TE mobilization and accumulation are an important source of genomic innovations that greatly contribute to the host species evolution. To ensure their maintenance and amplification, TE transposition must occur in the germ cell genome. As TE transposition is also a major threat to genome integrity, the outcome of TE mobility in germ cell genomes could be highly dangerous because such mutations are inheritable. Thus, organisms have developed specialized strategies to protect the genome integrity from TE transposition, particularly in germ cells. Such effective TE silencing, together with ongoing mutations and negative selection, should result in the complete elimination of functional TEs from genomes. However, TEs have developed efficient strategies for their maintenance and spreading in populations, particularly by using horizontal transfer to invade the genome of novel species. Here, we discuss how TEs manage to bypass the host's silencing machineries to propagate in its genome and how hosts engage in a fightback against TE invasion and propagation. This shows how TEs and their hosts have been evolving together to achieve a fine balance between transposition and repression.

Citing Articles

Reactivation of a somatic errantivirus and germline invasion in Drosophila ovaries.

Yoth M, Maupetit-Mehouas S, Akkouche A, Gueguen N, Bertin B, Jensen S Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6096.

PMID: 37773253 PMC: 10541861. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41733-5.

References
1.
Piskurek O, Okada N . Poxviruses as possible vectors for horizontal transfer of retroposons from reptiles to mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(29):12046-51. PMC: 1924541. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700531104. View

2.
Dufourt J, Dennis C, Boivin A, Gueguen N, Theron E, Goriaux C . Spatio-temporal requirements for transposable element piRNA-mediated silencing during Drosophila oogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 42(4):2512-24. PMC: 3936749. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1184. View

3.
Syomin B, FEDOROVA L, Surkov S, Ilyin Y . The endogenous Drosophila melanogaster retrovirus gypsy can propagate in Drosophila hydei cells. Mol Gen Genet. 2001; 264(5):588-94. DOI: 10.1007/s004380000344. View

4.
Anxolabehere D, Nouaud D, Periquet G, Tchen P . P-element distribution in Eurasian populations of Drosophila melanogaster: A genetic and molecular analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985; 82(16):5418-22. PMC: 390580. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.16.5418. View

5.
Fadloun A, Le Gras S, Jost B, Ziegler-Birling C, Takahashi H, Gorab E . Chromatin signatures and retrotransposon profiling in mouse embryos reveal regulation of LINE-1 by RNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013; 20(3):332-8. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2495. View