» Articles » PMID: 12799095

The Vascular Impact of Aging and Vasoactive Drugs: Comparison of Two Digital Volume Pulse Measurements

Overview
Journal Am J Hypertens
Date 2003 Jun 12
PMID 12799095
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Indices of pressure wave reflection (RI(DVP)) and large artery stiffness (SI(DVP)) can be derived from the digital volume pulse (DVP). Indices obtained from the second derivative of the DVP have also been proposed to characterize vascular aging and effects of vasoactive drugs.

Methods: We compared RI(DVP) and SI(DVP) with the indices a/b, a/c, a/d, and a/e calculated from sequential peaks of the second derivative of the DVP in 124 healthy men. The DVP was obtained by measuring infrared light transmission through the finger. In 10 men measurements were obtained at baseline and during intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, 3 to 300 microg/min) and, on separate occasions, angiotensin II (AII, 75 to 300 microg/min) and saline vehicle.

Results: SI(DVP) was strongly associated with age (R = 0.63, P <.001) but little influenced by AII or GTN. RI(DVP) was weakly associated with age but showed a consistent dose-dependent increase during AII and a decrease during GTN. d/a was strongly associated with age (R = -0.66, P <.001), influenced by vasoactive drugs but did not change in a dose-dependent manner during GTN. Other second derivative indices were less strongly correlated with age and showed an inconsistent response to vasoactive drugs. Within subject standard deviations of SI(DVP) and d/a for measurements on different occasions were 2.1 and 5.4 "years of vascular aging" respectively.

Conclusions: In healthy men, RI(DVP) may be a more reliable index of the effects of vasoactive drugs than d/a. SI(DVP) is similarly associated with age as is d/a, but less variable and may thus be a better index of vascular aging.

Citing Articles

Estimation of aortic stiffness by finger photoplethysmography using enhanced pulse wave analysis and machine learning.

Hellqvist H, Karlsson M, Hoffman J, Kahan T, Spaak J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1350726.

PMID: 38529332 PMC: 10961400. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1350726.


Estimation of phase distortions of the photoplethysmographic signal in digital IIR filtering.

Lapitan D, Rogatkin D, Molchanova E, Tarasov A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6546.

PMID: 38503856 PMC: 10951216. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57297-3.


Insights into vascular physiology from sleep photoplethysmography.

Yilmaz G, Ong J, Ling L, Chee M Sleep. 2023; 46(10).

PMID: 37379483 PMC: 10566244. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsad172.


Multimodal Finger Pulse Wave Sensing: Comparison of Forcecardiography and Photoplethysmography Sensors.

Andreozzi E, Sabbadini R, Centracchio J, Bifulco P, Irace A, Breglio G Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19).

PMID: 36236663 PMC: 9570799. DOI: 10.3390/s22197566.


The effects of a motorized passive simulated jogging device on descent of the arterial pulse waveform dicrotic notch: A single arm placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Adams J, Lopez J, Nadkarni V, Zolkipli-Cunningham Z, Ischiropoulos H, Sackner M Physiol Rep. 2022; 10(15):e15418.

PMID: 35924333 PMC: 9350470. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15418.