» Articles » PMID: 12794401

Effects of Dopamine, Norepinephrine, and Epinephrine on the Splanchnic Circulation in Septic Shock: Which is Best?

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 2003 Jun 10
PMID 12794401
Citations 95
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of different doses of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in patients with septic shock.

Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label study.

Setting: A 31-bed, medicosurgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Patients: Convenience sample of 20 patients with septic shock, separated into two groups according to whether (moderate shock group, n = 10) or not (severe shock, n = 10) dopamine alone was able maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg.

Interventions: Dopamine was progressively withdrawn and replaced successively by norepinephrine and then epinephrine (the order of the two agents was randomly determined) to maintain mean arterial pressure constant (moderate shock) or to increase mean arterial pressure above 65 mm Hg (severe shock).

Measurements And Main Results: Systemic circulation (pulmonary artery catheter) and splanchnic circulation (indocyanine green dilution and hepatic vein catheter) and gastric mucosal Pco(2) (gas tonometry) were measured during dopamine (moderate shock only), norepinephrine, and epinephrine administration (both groups). Data were analyzed with nonparametric tests and are presented as median [percentiles 25-75]. In moderate shock, cardiac index was similar to dopamine and norepinephrine (3.1 [2.7-3.8] vs. 2.9 [2.7-4.1] L/min.m2, p = nonsignificant) but greater with epinephrine (4.1 [3.5-4.4] p <.01 vs. dopamine and norepinephrine). Splanchnic blood flow was similar with the three agents (732 [413-1483] vs. 746 [470-1401] vs. 653 [476-1832] mL/min.m, p = nonsignificant). The gradient between mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturations was lower with dopamine than with norepinephrine and epinephrine, but the Pco(2) gap was similar with the three agents. In severe shock, cardiac index was higher, but splanchnic blood flow was lower, with epinephrine than with norepinephrine (4.6 [3.7-5.3] vs. 3.4 [3.0-4.1] L/min.m2, p <.01 and 860 [684-1334] vs. 977 [806-1802] mL/min.m2, p <.05, respectively). Epinephrine increased the mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturation gradient but did not alter Pco(2) gap.

Conclusions: Dopamine and norepinephrine have similar hemodynamic effects, but epinephrine can impair splanchnic circulation in severe septic shock.

Citing Articles

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.

Shime N, Nakada T, Yatabe T, Yamakawa K, Aoki Y, Inoue S Acute Med Surg. 2025; 12(1):e70037.

PMID: 39996161 PMC: 11848044. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70037.


Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.

Park C, Ku N, Park D, Park J, Ha T, Kim D Acute Crit Care. 2024; 39(4):445-472.

PMID: 39622601 PMC: 11617831. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920.


Scoping Review: Is Push-Dose Norepinephrine a Better Choice?.

Berkenbush M, Singh L, Sessa K, Saadi R West J Emerg Med. 2024; 25(5):708-714.

PMID: 39319801 PMC: 11418863. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18584.


Effects of metaraminol and norepinephrine on hemodynamics and kidney function in a miniature pig model of septic shock.

Li X, Bai Y, Tian C, Yang F, Fan W, Zhang K J Transl Int Med. 2024; 12(3):253-262.

PMID: 39081274 PMC: 11284895. DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2023-0131.


Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the Italian council for the optimization of antimicrobial use.

Sartelli M, Tascini C, Coccolini F, Dellai F, Ansaloni L, Antonelli M World J Emerg Surg. 2024; 19(1):23.

PMID: 38851757 PMC: 11162065. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00551-w.