A Critique of Claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) That DDAT is an Effective Treatment for Children with Reading Difficulties--'lies, Damned Lies and (inappropriate) Statistics'?
Authors
Affiliations
Reynolds, Nicolson and Hambly (Dyslexia 2003; 9: 48) report a study to evaluate the effectiveness of dyslexia dyspraxia attention deficit treatment (DDAT)-an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties. They claim that DDAT is an effective treatment with positive effects on the cognitive skills underlying literacy and the reading process. We outline the numerous methodological and statistical problems with this study and conclude that it provides no evidence that DDAT is an effective form of treatment for children with reading difficulties.
An fMRI study of finger movements in children with and without dyslexia.
Turesky T, Luetje M, Eden G Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1135437.
PMID: 37274202 PMC: 10233035. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1135437.
Pellegrino M, Ben-Soussan T, Paoletti P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).
PMID: 36834011 PMC: 9966639. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043315.
Melillo R, Leisman G, Mualem R, Ornai A, Carmeli E Front Public Health. 2020; 8:431835.
PMID: 33282806 PMC: 7706103. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.431835.
Stavrinos G, Iliadou V, Pavlou M, Bamiou D Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:904.
PMID: 32973443 PMC: 7472992. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00904.
Halliday L Dyslexia. 2014; 20(2):101-18.
PMID: 24470350 PMC: 4291104. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1470.