» Articles » PMID: 12761645

Fine Control of Call Frequency by Horseshoe Bats

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2003 May 23
PMID 12761645
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The auditory system of horseshoe bats is narrowly tuned to the sound of their own echoes. During flight these bats continuously adjust the frequency of their echolocation calls to compensate for Doppler-effects in the returning echo. Horseshoe bats can accurately compensate for changes in echo frequency up to 5 kHz, but they do so through a sequence of small, temporally-independent, step changes in call frequency. The relationship between an echo's frequency and its subsequent impact on the frequency of the very next call is fundamental to how Doppler-shift compensation behavior works. We analyzed how horseshoe bats control call frequency by measuring the changes occurring between many successive pairs of calls during Doppler-shift compensation and relating the magnitude of these changes to the frequency of each intervening echo. The results indicate that Doppler-shift compensation is mediated by a pair of (echo)frequency-specific sigmoidal functions characterized by a threshold, a slope, and an upper limit to the maximum change in frequency that may occur between successive calls. The exact values of these parameters necessarily reflect properties of the underlying neural circuitry of Doppler-shift compensation and the motor control of vocalization, and provide insight into how neural feedback can accommodate the need for speed without sacrificing stability.

Citing Articles

Different auditory feedback control for echolocation and communication in horseshoe bats.

Liu Y, Feng J, Metzner W PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e62710.

PMID: 23638137 PMC: 3634746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062710.


Behavioural and neurobiological implications of linear and non-linear features in larynx phonations of horseshoe bats.

Kobayasi K, Hage S, Berquist S, Feng J, Zhang S, Metzner W Nat Commun. 2012; 3:1184.

PMID: 23149729 PMC: 3552533. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2165.


Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals.

Schnitzler H, Denzinger A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010; 197(5):541-59.

PMID: 20857119 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0569-6.


On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude.

Hiryu S, Shiori Y, Hosokawa T, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008; 194(9):841-51.

PMID: 18663454 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0355-x.

References
1.
Neumann I, Schuller G . Spectral and temporal gating mechanisms enhance the clutter rejection in the echolocating bat, Rhinolophus rouxi. J Comp Physiol A. 1991; 169(1):109-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF00198177. View

2.
Grinnell A . Sensory-motor control: listening to the voice within. Nature. 1989; 341(6242):488-9. DOI: 10.1038/341488a0. View

3.
Pillat J, Schuller G . Audiovocal behavior of Doppler-shift compensation in the horseshoe bat survives bilateral lesion of the paralemniscal tegmental area. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 119(1):17-26. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050315. View

4.
Smotherman M, Zhang S, Metzner W . A neural basis for auditory feedback control of vocal pitch. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(4):1464-77. PMC: 6742276. View

5.
Kobler J, Wilson B, Henson Jr O, Bishop A . Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats. Hear Res. 1985; 20(2):99-108. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90161-3. View